Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 20:48, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer napisał:
migrating from mod to cgi is good as in security, but performance and
also problems with some scripts.
Could you also test fastcgi? cgi and fastcgi are different beasts.
I assume turckcache is turcksoft m
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 20:48, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer napisał:
migrating from mod to cgi is good as in security, but performance and
also problems with some scripts.
Could you also test fastcgi? cgi and fastcgi are different beasts.
I assume turckcache is turcksoft
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 20:48, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer napisał:
> migrating from mod to cgi is good as in security, but performance and
> also problems with some scripts.
Could you also test fastcgi? cgi and fastcgi are different beasts.
> Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz CS a
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 06:42, Joris wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm looking for some in-depth information on the speed difference
> between mod_php and using php-cgi with fastcgi.
>
> So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
> clean up the language a bit): "mod_php i
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 20:48, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer napisał:
> migrating from mod to cgi is good as in security, but performance and
> also problems with some scripts.
Could you also test fastcgi? cgi and fastcgi are different beasts.
> Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz CS a
Hi,
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 06:42, Joris wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm looking for some in-depth information on the speed difference
> between mod_php and using php-cgi with fastcgi.
>
> So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
> clean up the language a bit): "mod_php i
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:22:27PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> Right now running apache and having multiple virtual hosts for multiple
> clients is not secure. Each client can look into others *.php, *.inc files,
> read for example database passwords from these files etc.
suexec is m
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 14:32, Shri Shrikumar napisał:
> * How difficult is it to do? (est Man hours would be useful too)
I'm not familiar with apache internals, so I can't say but MPM's are written
in modular way so it does not need to rewrite whole apache. You would have to
fix/rewrite on
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:22:27PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> Right now running apache and having multiple virtual hosts for multiple
> clients is not secure. Each client can look into others *.php, *.inc files,
> read for example database passwords from these files etc.
suexec is m
Shri Shrikumar wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:11, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in apache2
that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
It would be great if someone get paid to fix that once for all.
I wonder if you cou
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:11, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in apache2
> that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
>
> It would be great if someone get paid to fix that once for all.
Hi,
I wonder if you could fill
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 14:32, Shri Shrikumar napisał:
> * How difficult is it to do? (est Man hours would be useful too)
I'm not familiar with apache internals, so I can't say but MPM's are written
in modular way so it does not need to rewrite whole apache. You would have to
fix/rewrite on
Shri Shrikumar wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:11, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in apache2
that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
It would be great if someone get paid to fix that once for all.
I wonder if you co
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:11, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in apache2
> that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
>
> It would be great if someone get paid to fix that once for all.
Hi,
I wonder if you could fill
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:05, Joris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in
> > apache2 that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
>
> Is that the mode where the clients run with a different uid for each
> virtual host?
Yes.
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 06:42, Joris napisał:
So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
clean up the language a bit): "mod_php is a lot fast er than php-cgi",
and "fastcgi/php is a lot faster than mod_php". Not very usefull.
For me it
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 11:24, Adam ENDRODI napisał:
> Privilege separation and fastcgi is not trivial to solve. You must
> specify a different interpreter for each user.
Huh? Why different interpreter?
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/index.php/ApacheModFastcgiPHP
> Authorization and f
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:42:08AM +0100, Joris wrote:
>
> Also, experiences migrating from mod_php to (fast)cgi/php would be
> welcome :)
You'll need to recompile the interpreter. That's a lot of fun.
Privilege separation and fastcgi is not trivial to solve. You must
specify a different int
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:05, Joris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The interesting thing is that no one works on fixing perchild MPM in
> > apache2 that would allow to use standard mod_php in secure way :/
>
> Is that the mode where the clients run with a different uid for each
> virtual host?
Yes.
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 06:42, Joris napisał:
So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
clean up the language a bit): "mod_php is a lot fast er than php-cgi",
and "fastcgi/php is a lot faster than mod_php". Not very usefull.
For me it
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 11:24, Adam ENDRODI napisał:
> Privilege separation and fastcgi is not trivial to solve. You must
> specify a different interpreter for each user.
Huh? Why different interpreter?
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/index.php/ApacheModFastcgiPHP
> Authorization and f
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:42:08AM +0100, Joris wrote:
>
> Also, experiences migrating from mod_php to (fast)cgi/php would be
> welcome :)
You'll need to recompile the interpreter. That's a lot of fun.
Privilege separation and fastcgi is not trivial to solve. You must
specify a different int
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 06:42, Joris napisał:
> So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
> clean up the language a bit): "mod_php is a lot fast er than php-cgi",
> and "fastcgi/php is a lot faster than mod_php". Not very usefull.
For me it was 0.7 req/s on one m
Dnia Friday 19 of March 2004 06:42, Joris napisał:
> So far a google search has yielded nothing but unbacked statements (I'll
> clean up the language a bit): "mod_php is a lot fast er than php-cgi",
> and "fastcgi/php is a lot faster than mod_php". Not very usefull.
For me it was 0.7 req/s on one m
24 matches
Mail list logo
