On Tue, 16 May 2000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:28:40PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
>
> > Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
> > anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
> > quickly and haven't read it before,
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:28:40PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
> Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
> anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
> quickly and haven't read it before, because you just want to put in
> something, then i
Exim:
Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
quickly and haven't read it before, because you just want to put in
something, then it is unusable.
Features: probably rich enough.
Speed: much sl
At 01:03 PM 5/15/00 +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Robert Varga wrote:
Qmail isn't a regular package because it's got licence issues.
Also Qmail is lacking in functionality when compared to Postfix, Sendmail, or
probably any other Unix mail server. Qmail is fast and reliable, it'
>> >Use qmail and vpopmail. They are both packaged to debian, so there should
>> >not be much of a problem for it.
>>
>> Qmail isn't a regular package because it's got licence issues.
>>
>
>It is in debian in source package form, it can be built with one command,
>so it is not a real problem I t
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2000, Robert Varga wrote:
> >Use qmail and vpopmail. They are both packaged to debian, so there should
> >not be much of a problem for it.
>
> Qmail isn't a regular package because it's got licence issues.
>
It is in debian in source
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Robert Varga wrote:
>Use qmail and vpopmail. They are both packaged to debian, so there should
>not be much of a problem for it.
Qmail isn't a regular package because it's got licence issues.
Also Qmail is lacking in functionality when compared to Postfix, Sendmail, or
proba
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Chad A. Adlawan wrote:
>> For best performance have no direct TCP connections between your mail server
>> and the outside world. Have the MX records point to an inbound-relay which
>> sends the mail to the real server.
>
> hello :-)
>
> i pretty much dont get this part. w
Use qmail and vpopmail. They are both packaged to debian, so there should
not be much of a problem for it.
Vpopmail is a virtual domain pop3 server suited for serving as many as
23million POP3 mailboxes taking up only one system user, integrating with
qmail and other qmail-extension software. It
>
> For best performance have no direct TCP connections between your mail server
> and the outside world. Have the MX records point to an inbound-relay which
> sends the mail to the real server.
hello :-)
i pretty much dont get this part. what should be done is to point the MX
record to
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
>On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 04:10:40PM +0800, Chad A. Adlawan wrote:
>> does anybody have any URL's or docs w/ talks on how to build
>> a mail server (both Exim and Sendmail are OK w/ me) with more
>> than 65,000 users ? i.e., what are the availabl
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 04:10:40PM +0800, Chad A. Adlawan wrote:
> does anybody have any URL's or docs w/ talks on how to build
> a mail server (both Exim and Sendmail are OK w/ me) with more
> than 65,000 users ? i.e., what are the available methods (and
> what are the best ones) o
"Chad A. Adlawan" wrote:
> i have this feeling that this has been asked b4 already but i cant locate
> it in the archives. anyway :
>
> does anybody have any URL's or docs w/ talks on how to build a mail
> server (both Exim and Sendmail are OK w/ me) with more than 65,000 users ?
> i.e
Hi,
perhaps have a look at qmail-ldap. You can manage all your users including
quota and all that in your ldap directory and everything runs with a
single UID. And you can run a cluster of POP-3 machines. BTW: gmx.net is
running on qmail and they have 500k+ users.
Torsten
On Fri, 12 May 2000,
14 matches
Mail list logo
