Re: bandwidth accounting

Simon Buchanan wrote: > Hi There, Im wondering if someone can point me in the right > direction We are wanting to account bandwidth usage per IP in our > rack.. Is this possible, if so - and good ideas? > Hi, Other than ipac and ipac-ng you could also use netflow. The only requirement is that y

Re: bandwidth accounting

Am 2004-12-14 09:10:18, schrieb Simon Buchanan: > Hi There, Im wondering if someone can point me in the right > direction We are wanting to account bandwidth usage per IP in our > rack.. Is this possible, if so - and good ideas? apt-get install ipac-ng > Simon Greetings Michelle -- Linux

Re: bandwidth accounting

also sprach Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.13.2110 +0100]: > Hi There, Im wondering if someone can point me in the right > direction We are wanting to account bandwidth usage per IP in our > rack.. Is this possible, if so - and good ideas? read the archives. check out ipac. --

Re: bandwidth

Hello! > Hi, > My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local > backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a > reasonable internet access service? > Thanks, > We run business like this in Poland, with few tousands customers now. ou I suggest 2mbps + linux

Re: bandwidth

Hello! > Hi, > My question is how much bandwidth should I ask for with my local > backbone to provide such universe of almost 96 home computers with a > reasonable internet access service? > Thanks, > We run business like this in Poland, with few tousands customers now. ou I suggest 2mbps + linux

Re: bandwidth

Thankyou all that repplied. I live in Brazil, and here internet connection is still expensive. I'm going to get in touch with the only two backbone providers in my region and will ask for 1-2mbps links prices. -- Carlos

Re: bandwidth

Thankyou all that repplied. I live in Brazil, and here internet connection is still expensive. I'm going to get in touch with the only two backbone providers in my region and will ask for 1-2mbps links prices. -- Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > >> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). >> >>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >>> usually I note th

Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). > >> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >> usually I note throtting

Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > >> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). >> >>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >>> usually I note th

Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). > >> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >> usually I note throtting

RE: bandwidth

You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). > As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing > and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when > usually I note throtting on my downloads. > > -- > Carlos

RE: bandwidth

You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). > As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing > and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when > usually I note throtting on my downloads. > > -- > Carlos -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: bandwidth

Hi! Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing. Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic. If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go cheaper wit

Re: bandwidth

i know of places here in the US (apartment complexes where they charge the same rate as DSL and pipe 2 gige lines into their main complex and devide it up from there. so for me it is not the price. i look at the bw that could possibly be used and go from there. --jeremy > Hi! > > Wooohhh ... I a

Re: bandwidth

Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 11:19 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete > usually I note throtting on my downloads. so: presently what is the rate available at off-peak and on-peak (just try ) ? Are they satisfied ??? (I would say: 1 MBit ... if usage is low , if all people uses the net i would

Re: bandwidth

personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price. --jeremy

Re: bandwidth

* Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-04-2004 11:03]: > What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle > on peaks ? > since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing and

Re: bandwidth

What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle on peaks ? since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current usage Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 10:57 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete > I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wi

Re: bandwidth

Hi! Wooohhh ... I assume 100Meg is the peak due to 100BaseTX cableing. Here in Germany you would have to differenciate between the local loop and the traffic. The loop itself often more expensive than the traffic. If you divide the price of a e3/t3 by 100 (users) you would probably go cheaper wi

Re: bandwidth

i know of places here in the US (apartment complexes where they charge the same rate as DSL and pipe 2 gige lines into their main complex and devide it up from there. so for me it is not the price. i look at the bw that could possibly be used and go from there. --jeremy > Hi! > > Wooohhh ... I a

Re: bandwidth

Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 11:19 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete > usually I note throtting on my downloads. so: presently what is the rate available at off-peak and on-peak (just try ) ? Are they satisfied ??? (I would say: 1 MBit ... if usage is low , if all people uses the net i would

Re: bandwidth

personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price. --jeremy

Re: bandwidth

* Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-04-2004 11:03]: > What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle > on peaks ? > since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing and

Re: bandwidth

What kind of traffic ? what kind of usage pattern ? Is allowable to throttle on peaks ? since there is now a link you should be able to know what is current usage Il 12 Apr 2004 alle 10:57 Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes immise in rete > I live in a building which has 96 apartments, all of them wi

Re: Bandwidth monitoring .. hints/tips & which tool?

> > Both ntop > and iptraf should do this. > iptraf is lighter on resources, and offer realtime monitoring, > ntop is accessed trough an browser, and offers extensive graphs of > traffic. > It all depends on how low-end this box is. > > --

Re: Bandwidth monitoring .. hints/tips & which tool?

On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:18:42PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Hi all - > > [Summary: What tool is best for traffic monitoring down to the per-user > level?] > > Just wondered if anyone could point me in the right direction so that I > can build a positive image of Debian within the organ

Re: Bandwidth monitoring .. hints/tips & which tool?

On Mon, 19 May 2003, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > If not, and MRTG just isn't the tool for this job, then what is? > > I'm not averse to a bit of perl/whatever hacking, but would like to use > an existing tool if it's out there! > > Any ideas? On-list, please. http://packages.debian.org/unstabl

Re: Bandwidth monitoring

Hi On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:36:12AM +0100, debian-isp wrote: > For me it would be interessting how I can monitor traffic per > Ip Adress reliably ( I tried ipacsum ) and graph the data; > I gues it is only possible by assinging each customer a seperate > IP address and then .. What do you use

Re: Bandwidth monitoring

> When installing servers in a colocated environment what do people > suggest for monitoring bandwidth used by virtual hosts on that server? Hello You can try modlogan (http://www.modlogan.org/), we are using it for IIS, Apache(clf) and Proftpd logs. --Jan Vitek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bandwidth monitoring

Hi Fraser, For monitoring bandwidth we write scripts which read the logs for apache, ftp and smtp. The extracted data is then inserted into a postgresql database. You can then do all sorts of SQL to analyze the data. As users approach their limits they are emailed to notify them. If the user's go

Re: Bandwidth configuration

Re, > I have heard from someone using iproute, or QoS, but I have not found any > examples. > Can anyone help me, please? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ MolTi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bandwidth configuration

Package: shaper Priority: extra Section: net Installed-Size: 212 Maintainer: David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 2.2.12-0.7-2 Depends: debconf (>= 0.5), iproute Filename: pool/main/s/shaper/shaper_2.2.12-0.7-2_all.deb Size: 99666 MD5sum: 4c9ecab3a0eae72923c309a448f1105b De

Re: Bandwidth configuration

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 04:16, Szőts Róbert wrote: > Hi there! > > My problem is the following: > > I have a dsl connection to the Internet, but it is assimmetric. I am > connecting through a woody box. Therefore If someone sends a big mail to > someone, the outging packets are make the line busy. > Wh

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:37:37AM +1000, Jason Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > If you live in Australia, i'm sure you know about the exorbant prices for > broadband here. HK, on the other hand, provide unlimited bandwidth and > fast connections. > > I was wondering about this... okay, we know about mod

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

Hello Jason On 3 Sep 2002 at 6:49, Jason Lim wrote: > Lots of email... lots of mailing lists... i imagine that compressing > emails (of which i get maybe 50-100 each day... a chunk of that is spam, > but nonetheless it uses bandwidth) would yield very high compression > rates. We use uucp mail

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:15:55AM +1000, Joel Michael wrote: > > However, the biggest problem I found was that when ssh disconnects, it > doesn't automatically reconnect. I guess some magic scripting would get > around that easily enough, but that's when I dropped the whole idea over > a year ag

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 04:37, Jason Lim wrote: > Any ideas on how this tunnelling could be made completely transparent (or > as transparent as possible)? > Well, I've done something like this with ssh tunnels and mangling the DNS locally. Basically, set up a compressed ssh tunnel using the -L opti

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

> > Email does compress reasonably well, but having your mail server in another > country raises an entirely new set of issues. There's issues of support etc. > > As you have probably noticed I have a lot of experience of this... Yes... ;-) > Also email (excluding file attachments which are usu

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:49, Jason Lim wrote: > > What do you do on the net? > > Lots of email... lots of mailing lists... i imagine that compressing > emails (of which i get maybe 50-100 each day... a chunk of that is spam, > but nonetheless it uses bandwidth) would yield very high compression > rate

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:37, Jason Lim wrote: > > However, I was wondering if there is a solid method to setup a link > > between a Linux or Windows or Mac box here in Australia, and have all data > > travel across a compressed tunnel of some sort. > > What do you do on the net? Lots of email... l

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

At 9:12 PM +0200 9/2/02, Russell Coker wrote: >The best thing that people in countries like Australia can do is to lobby >their politicians to change some of the telecommunications laws. Allowing >more competition in the local telecoms market would lower prices. Which is when the monoploy telco w

Re: Bandwidth... compression... saving $$?

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:37, Jason Lim wrote: > However, I was wondering if there is a solid method to setup a link > between a Linux or Windows or Mac box here in Australia, and have all data > travel across a compressed tunnel of some sort. What do you do on the net? Web access? It's mostly jpg a

Re: Bandwidth testing

- Original Message - From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:39 AM Subject: Re: Bandwidth testing > > > > I was wondering what the best way to determine maximum b

Re: Bandwidth testing

> > I was wondering what the best way to determine maximum bandwidth > > thoughtput is. I've looked at "bing", but it doesn't seem very accurate to > > me. > > > > Do you know of a tool or method which can simulate large bandwidth > > traffic, or can otherwise measure what maximum bandwidth though

Re: Bandwidth testing

I'd try tptest. http://www.iis.se/tptest/TPTEST2/tptest.zip (source) tptest is a client - server application for testing IP (tcp/udp) linkspeeds. Yours, Christofer On 14 Aug 2002 18:53 CEST you wrote: > Hi all, > > I suspect that our upstream bandwidth providers including AGC (Asia Global >

Re: Bandwidth testing

- Original Message - From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 6:59 PM Subject: Bandwidth testing > Hi all, > > I suspect that our upstream bandwidth providers including AGC (Asia Global > Crossing) and that aren't providing us with the maximum possible b

Re: Bandwidth on Apache

On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 11:07, Michal Novotny wrote: > How can I slow down connection to/from one virtual host? mod_throttle -- Tot ziens, Bart-Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bandwidth on Apache

Try mod_throttle... actually, there are a number of packages. Search for mod-* and you'll find many interesting apache modules. Jason - Original Message - From: "Michal Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:07 PM Subject: Bandwidth on Apac

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

Hello, Try to install glftpd (www.glftpd.com) it's very configurable for your bandwith usage -- A. Ramos: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin Sistemas, PrisaCOM Telf: 91.353.7930 Edificio Apot, 5a planta 28042 Madrid. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: Bandwidth limiting

Hi, I am running into the same problem and would like to know if you could provide a reference URL to some documentation on the various uses of 'tc' (or iproute in general). On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:33:29PM -0500, Guillaume wrote: > > Thank you all, > iproute was what I was looking for so long.

Re: Bandwidth limiting

Hi, I am running into the same problem and would like to know if you could provide a reference URL to some documentation on the various uses of 'tc' (or iproute in general). On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 07:33:29PM -0500, Guillaume wrote: > > Thank you all, > iproute was what I was looking for so long

Re: Bandwidth limiting

Thank you all, iproute was what I was looking for so long. just with this I reduce a little my outgoing bandwidth, but interactivity is greatly increased as well as my ping and DL bandwidth ! # tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 240kbit latency 30ms burst 1700 Raising the burst (=bucket) incre

Re: Bandwidth limiting

Thank you all, iproute was what I was looking for so long. just with this I reduce a little my outgoing bandwidth, but interactivity is greatly increased as well as my ping and DL bandwidth ! # tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 240kbit latency 30ms burst 1700 Raising the burst (=bucket) incr

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wednesday 13 February 2002 13:25 pm, Greg Hunt wrote: > I'm not sure I completely understand your question, you want to let users > with faster connections have higher limits? How are you going to know their > connection speed? If what you are looking for is a ftp server that lets you > specify

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

I'm not sure I completely understand your question, you want to let users with faster connections have higher limits? How are you going to know their connection speed? If what you are looking for is a ftp server that lets you specify different rates for different users, then try NcFTPd (www.ncft

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Michael Merritt wrote: > But that will limit each client to n bps, regardless if they are on 56k or > T3. I don't want to do this; instead, I want to allow say 1Mbps of bandwidth > for upload and let whoever has the big pipes get the fast downloads. > > Is there a way to do

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:57, Michael Merritt wrote: > I've got some files on an anonymous FTP server that I'd like to open up for > download to users of some online forums. But I don't want to let them > completely suck my bandwidth dry. I'm running proftpd 1.2.4. > > I see in the documentation

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wednesday 13 February 2002 13:25 pm, Greg Hunt wrote: > I'm not sure I completely understand your question, you want to let users > with faster connections have higher limits? How are you going to know their > connection speed? If what you are looking for is a ftp server that lets you > specify

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

I'm not sure I completely understand your question, you want to let users with faster connections have higher limits? How are you going to know their connection speed? If what you are looking for is a ftp server that lets you specify different rates for different users, then try NcFTPd (www.ncft

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Michael Merritt wrote: > But that will limit each client to n bps, regardless if they are on 56k or > T3. I don't want to do this; instead, I want to allow say 1Mbps of bandwidth > for upload and let whoever has the big pipes get the fast downloads. > > Is there a way to do

Re: Bandwidth control on FTP

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:57, Michael Merritt wrote: > I've got some files on an anonymous FTP server that I'd like to open up for > download to users of some online forums. But I don't want to let them > completely suck my bandwidth dry. I'm running proftpd 1.2.4. > > I see in the documentation

Re: Bandwidth limiting

You should have a look at http://my.netfilter.se/ > My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru > FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if > they really don't need much by themselves. > > I head BSD has this kind of bandwidth limiting

Re: Bandwidth limiting

You should have a look at http://my.netfilter.se/ > My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru > FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if > they really don't need much by themselves. > > I head BSD has this kind of bandwidth limiting

Re: Bandwidth limiting

> My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru > FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if > they really don't need much by themselves. > > I head BSD has this kind of bandwidth limiting possibilities. > What about Deb ? > > I tried limiting

Re: Bandwidth limiting

> My users are using all the outgoing bandwidth by downloading files thru > FTP, port 20. This results in the eMail and Web being unusable, even if > they really don't need much by themselves. > > I head BSD has this kind of bandwidth limiting possibilities. > What about Deb ? > > I tried limitin

Re: Bandwidth Control

On Fri Aug 24 2001 at 10:49:35AM -0300 'Rodrigo Cesar Herefeld' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > May i use shaper control to configure the max bandwidth each user on a > system con access? > If not , wich program may i use for that?? > I have one box with kern 2.2.19 and intend to use this to c

Re: bandwidth monitoring

Kevin wrote: > I've got a cisco 2610 and I want to monitor the bandwidth used by > various subnets and in some cases by certain ips. Is there someway > to either make snmp/mrtg check this or perhaps another app? ... have a look for Cisco NETFLOW. Florian! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bandwidth Limit/Control

On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, KoML wrote: > Does Anyone know of a tool for limiting or controling bandwidth on a > network. I have heard there are software out there that will do > - IP traffic bandwidth shaping/limiting daemon > > Anyone hear of this or anyother software like this. > > My objective i

Re: Bandwidth Limit/Control

On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, KoML wrote: > Does Anyone know of a tool for limiting or controling bandwidth on a > network. I have heard there are software out there that will do > - IP traffic bandwidth shaping/limiting daemon > > Anyone hear of this or anyother software like this. > > My objective