RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Jeff S Wheeler
n ISP List (E-Mail) Subject: Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences > Back to questioning: > recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are > about about 85% of the net-acct results. > Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?), >

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Nicolas Bougues
> Back to questioning: > recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are > about about 85% of the net-acct results. > Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?), > and TCP/IP frame info, etc.? Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served.

RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Jeff S Wheeler
bian ISP List (E-Mail) Subject: Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences > Back to questioning: > recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are > about about 85% of the net-acct results. > Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?)

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Nicolas Bougues
> Back to questioning: > recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are > about about 85% of the net-acct results. > Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?), > and TCP/IP frame info, etc.? Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:17, Haim Dimermanas wrote: > > Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e. > > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size > > of a packet (just the payload, or the headers too?) > > From the Apache docs @ > http://http

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:17, Haim Dimermanas wrote: > > Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e. > > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size > > of a packet (just the payload, or the headers too?) > > From the Apache docs @ > http://htt

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-07 Thread Haim Dimermanas
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e. > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a > packet (just the payload, or the headers too?) >From the Apache docs @ http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html bytes The number

Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences

2001-05-07 Thread Haim Dimermanas
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e. > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a > packet (just the payload, or the headers too?) >From the Apache docs @ http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html bytes The number