Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

Hi, On Fri Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote: > try. Has anyone compared amavis to mailscanner and come to a definite > conclusion as to one being better. I know better is very subjective but I'd > still like to hear opinions. Mailscanner has one big disadvantage when used

Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

Hi, On Fri Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote: > try. Has anyone compared amavis to mailscanner and come to a definite > conclusion as to one being better. I know better is very subjective but I'd > still like to hear opinions. Mailscanner has one big disadvantage when used

Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote: > > We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it > generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just > continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the messag

Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

Fraser Campbell wrote: Hi, We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the message bounces. We're using amavisd-postfix. I

Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 at 11:08:35 -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote: > > We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it > generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just > continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the messag

Re: Mailscanner vs. amavis vs. other

Fraser Campbell wrote: Hi, We've had some experience with amavis over the last few years and while it generally works it has an a tendency to lose the occassional message or just continually requeue messages until their queue time expires and the message bounces. We're using amavisd-postfix.