Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Jernej Horvat
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson > > What are other people doing? sticking to RFCs. O:-) i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes on weekend. -- Only a fool fights in a burning house. -- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the

Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote: > Hi, > > what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the > mail queue? Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that > seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning > back

Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Jernej Horvat
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson > > What are other people doing? sticking to RFCs. O:-) i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes on weekend. -- Only a fool fights in a burning house. -- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the

Re: Mail Queue timeouts

2003-10-23 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote: > Hi, > > what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the > mail queue? Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that > seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning > back