This is called a "hidden master"... yep it works.
Make sure your SOA records show the SLAVE server as the SOA, for servers
wanting an authoritative answer.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 02:20:59AM -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> hello again,
> sorry if i didnt present my point clearly enough on that, my qu
This is called a "hidden master"... yep it works.
Make sure your SOA records show the SLAVE server as the SOA, for servers
wanting an authoritative answer.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 02:20:59AM -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> hello again,
> sorry if i didnt present my point clearly enough on that, my q
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "t s a d i" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: InterNIC Name Server is a slave server
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
>
> > At
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 02:20 AM 3/7/00 -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> >is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
> >is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
> >external/different DNS server ?
>
> As long as the servers listed
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 02:20 AM 3/7/00 -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> >is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
> >is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
> >external/different DNS server ?
>
> As long as the servers listed
At 02:20 AM 3/7/00 -0800, t s a d i wrote:
>is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
>is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
>external/different DNS server ?
As long as the servers listed by InterNIC give out correct DNS info, it
shouldn't ma
hello again,
sorry if i didnt present my point clearly enough on that, my question
is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
external/different DNS server ?
thanks again,
chad
___
7 matches
Mail list logo
