On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:22, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Isn't there a security update for that?
>
> There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato,
> thats why I needed to recompile it.
Sorry, I misread your email. My brain translates "!=woody" to "==potato". ;)
> > Greppi
Hello Russell
On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote:
> Isn't there a security update for that?
There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato,
thats why I needed to recompile it.
> > The compilation bombs out with the following message:
> >
> > make[3]: Entering di
On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:22, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Isn't there a security update for that?
>
> There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato,
> thats why I needed to recompile it.
Sorry, I misread your email. My brain translates "!=woody" to "==potato". ;)
> > Grepp
Hello Russell
On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote:
> Isn't there a security update for that?
There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato,
thats why I needed to recompile it.
> > The compilation bombs out with the following message:
> >
> > make[3]: Entering d
On Monday 05 March 2001 16:01, I. Forbes wrote:
> I am trying to compile the latest "bind" on a slink system.
>
> (It is a production system that I don't wish to upgrade right now, and
> I am also not happy running the old vulnerable version ...)
Isn't there a security update for that?
> The comp
On Monday 05 March 2001 16:01, I. Forbes wrote:
> I am trying to compile the latest "bind" on a slink system.
>
> (It is a production system that I don't wish to upgrade right now, and
> I am also not happy running the old vulnerable version ...)
Isn't there a security update for that?
> The com
6 matches
Mail list logo
