On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 18:03, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Which I suppose is a good reason why we should work towards ASMTP, a 8-bit
> clean, mandatory endpoint authenticated SMTP (as in no backscatter,
> something using mandatory header signing).
There is the possibility of using the cur
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.20.1803
+0100]:
> Actually... as far as a lot of users are capable of thinking,
> that's exactly what SMTP should stand for: "I attach this file and
> send it, could it be simpler?". And you know something? I can
> see their po
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> 478181 kilobytes in a POP3 session... teach those folks that SMTP is
> not the simple mass transfer protocol.
Actually... as far as a lot of users are capable of thinking, that's exactly
what SMTP should stand for: "I attach this file and send it, coul
3 matches
Mail list logo