Hep
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:27:31AM +0100, Stefaan Teerlinck wrote:
> Most solutions use an "Outlook connector" on the client side, and an
> IMAP server as backend. They work great untill your mailbox gets to big,
> and than they get realy slow. You can find an overview for Exchange
> alternat
Hello!
I remember StarOffice having a shared Calender with a server. Never
have used it, so I cannot tell.
Didn't see it in OpenOffice, however haven't taken a close look.
Best regards,
Jorge-León
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 23:41, Simon Bland wrote:
> Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
> 'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
>
> Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
> nice way to tie linux machines i
evaluating it in our environment), it *should* be pretty standard to
incorporate into slapd or something similar.
Good Luck!
Cheers,
Shane.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 January 2003 10:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Consolidating
> > Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly
> provide a
> > nice way to tie linux machines into a MS based network?
>
> The later, AFAIK.
>
Most solutions use an "Outlook connector" on the client side, and an
IMAP server as backend. They work great untill your mailbox gets to b
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Simon Bland wrote:
> Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
> 'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
>
> Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
> nice way to tie linux machines into a MS
Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
nice way to tie linux machines into a MS based network?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:41:37P
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 12:06, Simon Bland wrote:
> LDAP was my first thought, but I've never really played with it, I've
> seen a few comments on Exchange using LDAP for an address book, but not
> as a source for it's own configuration.
>
> I'll take a look into LDAP and see what I can find.
>
> A
>
> Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand that's
> somewhat of a 'Holy Grail' for us all. Does anything out there come
> close to a replacement? The main things this place uses it for is the
> shared calander and shared folders - from outlook, and they aren't
> likely to ta
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Simon Bland wrote:
[snip]
> Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand that's
> somewhat of a 'Holy Grail' for us all. Does anything out there come
> close to a replacement? The main things this place uses it for is the
> shared calander and shared folders
LDAP was my first thought, but I've never really played with it, I've
seen a few comments on Exchange using LDAP for an address book, but not
as a source for it's own configuration.
I'll take a look into LDAP and see what I can find.
Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand
I would say what you need is an ldap directory. The only thing I'm not
sure on is if ldap and exchange work together (I'm sure they would).
It definetly works with Samba and samba can do the domain login stuff as a
side product.
Debian package:
slapd - OpenLDAP server (slapd).
http://www.openldap.
12 matches
Mail list logo
