Giles Nunn said:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried the dd route to do exactly the same thing. I wanted to recreate
> a server or a variation of it quickly and easily. Eventually I gave up
> and used systemimager instead. It is quick and simple. It is based on
> rsync and it is in woody. I have it working usin
On Tue, 2004-07-27 18:42:09 +0200, Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Il 27 Jul 2004 alle 18:18 Jan-Benedict Glaw immise in rete
> >> Try that with
> >> a formerly booting NT system on a NTFS filesystem:) just copy the
> >> "root"... by root i say /dev/hda
Hi all,
I tried the dd route to do exactly the same thing. I wanted to recreate
a server or a variation of it quickly and easily. Eventually I gave up
and used systemimager instead. It is quick and simple. It is based on
rsync and it is in woody. I have it working using network boot and it
takes ~
Il 27 Jul 2004 alle 18:18 Jan-Benedict Glaw immise in rete
>> Try that with
>> a formerly booting NT system on a NTFS filesystem:) just copy the
>> "root"... by root i say /dev/hda , the raw partition. I worked fine
>> for me many times.
>
> Aren't MS-DOS' io.sys and msdos.sys expected to be in
On Tue, 2004-07-27 17:52:25 +0200, Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Il 27 Jul 2004 alle 17:42 Jan-Benedict Glaw immise in rete
> > > I use knoppix to make a cpio image of the 'root filesystem' I'll be
> > > imaging. (eg mounted / /usr /home and /var). The
Il 27 Jul 2004 alle 17:42 Jan-Benedict Glaw immise in rete
> > I use knoppix to make a cpio image of the 'root filesystem' I'll be
> > imaging. (eg mounted / /usr /home and /var). Then with another
> > script
> Try that with a formerly booting NT system on a NTFS filesystem:)
just copy the "root".
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:15:54 EDT, "George Georgalis" writes:
>I don't think your system will work though. because you are writing the
>mbr and the partition table with the fs image, you would have to have
>the _exact_ same disk which is less common then you may expect.
If the new disk is _larger
On Tue, 2004-07-27 11:15:54 -0400, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:09:04PM +0200, Volker Tanger wrote:
> yes knoppix 2 will save time, you can "su -" from x as well.
...or just switch away from X11 down to one of the text cons
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:09:04PM +0200, Volker Tanger wrote:
>Boot in text mode ("knoppix 2") or Ctrl-Alt-1 from X11 into console. Try
>again then.
yes knoppix 2 will save time, you can "su -" from x as well.
your problem though is with the fstab knoppix creates, wait you're not
mounting the p
Greetings!
> > Do you have any kind of BIOS-configurable write/virus protection
> > for that harddisc switched off?
>
> BIOS is ignored nicely once the kernel switched on VM and went into
> protected more...
Yes, I know - but I've encountered hardware where the "100% IDE"
controller could be sw
On Tue, 2004-07-27 13:13:22 +0200, Volker Tanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:12:33 +0200 "David Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> [...]
> > Obviously the first thing I did was swap the
> > harddrive just in case the one in the new pc is faul
ll let you guys know how it goes.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Waldner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2004 01:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cloning disks with dd and netcat
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:13:22 +0200, "Volker Tanger" writes:
>What happen
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:14 +0200, "Volker Tanger" writes:
>True - but DDing a 200GB system disc disc takes quite some time, while
>manually handling partition+mkfs+lilo plus RSYNCing 1.2GB usually is
>LOTS faster...
>
>Upgrading to servers with newer/bigger discs is also less painful than
>with
Greetings!
> >Well, doing the partitioning manually, you could RSYNC
> >the server instead of DD+NETCATing, which probably is faster and
> >fails more gracefully.
>
> But would mean mucking around with the bootloader, which usually is
> the point for doing _complete_ disc-images.
True - but DDi
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:13:22 +0200, "Volker Tanger" writes:
>What happens if you do the partitioning manually and image the
>partitions (/dev/hda1, /dev/hda2, ...) one-by-one instead of the
>complete disc? Well, doing the partitioning manually, you could RSYNC
>the server instead of DD+NETCATing,
Greetings!
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:12:33 +0200 "David Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tty1[/]# nc -v -w 60 XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX < /dev/null | gzip -dc | dd
> of=/dev/hda bs=512
> imgserver.whatever.co.za [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX] (?) open
[...]
> hda: read_intr: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekCompl
16 matches
Mail list logo