Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-06 Thread Gene Grimm
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:33:37AM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote: > [...] > > Alot of people will resist this if it means replacing every mail server > > on the Internet, or even just the mail software on every Internet mail > > server. This has to be a revision compatible

Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-05 Thread Jorge . Lehner
Hello! On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:33:37AM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote: [...] > Alot of people will resist this if it means replacing every mail server > on the Internet, or even just the mail software on every Internet mail > server. This has to be a revision compatible with the existing SMTP > proto

Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-05 Thread Gene Grimm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There are several projects which discuss a substitution of traditional > Email with a more modern infrastructure, and I think it is time to > spent effort on pushing this forward and stop loosing time with > preventing what's inevitable - abuse of SMTP. > > Personall

Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-04 Thread Jorge . Lehner
Hello! On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:34:09AM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote: > Hi again > > Really the comparison between rbl lists is academic. It is good that > there are many different and evolving systems to block spam accordingly > with different success rates. > > However from a 'email service

Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-02 Thread cfm
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:34:09AM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote: > Hi again > > However from a 'email service provider' point of view (as per my > original email) I do not wish to block ANY legitimate email. The more > spam that is bounced the better BUT my requirement is purely 'If it > blocks

Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:34:09AM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote: > However from a 'email service provider' point of view (as per my > original email) I do not wish to block ANY legitimate email. The more > spam that is bounced the better BUT my requirement is purely 'If it > blocks legitimate email,

RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-02 Thread Glenn Hocking
Hi again Really the comparison between rbl lists is academic. It is good that there are many different and evolving systems to block spam accordingly with different success rates. However from a 'email service provider' point of view (as per my original email) I do not wish to block ANY legit