Ok, ok, sorry for the stupid question :P I were reading the wrong manual, I
should be reading the RFC... Well, thank you all, I'll try Spamassasin to
stop spam coming this way...
El Jueves, 29 de Enero de 2004 03:35, Fraser Campbell escribió:
> On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wr
Ok, ok, sorry for the stupid question :P I were reading the wrong manual, I
should be reading the RFC... Well, thank you all, I'll try Spamassasin to
stop spam coming this way...
El Jueves, 29 de Enero de 2004 03:35, Fraser Campbell escribió:
> On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wr
I am happy that the protocol is so simple.
If it was not for the RFC's, which do not work that well in modern times
where would we work ?
SMTP has been around for a very long time:
"The SMTP specification originally started with the Mail Transfer
Protocol in 1980, evolved into Si
I am happy that the protocol is so simple.
If it was not for the RFC's, which do not work that well in modern times
where would we work ?
SMTP has been around for a very long time:
"The SMTP specification originally started with the Mail Transfer
Protocol in 1980, evolved into Si
On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
> ("mail from:<>"), and it sends them as they was from
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
> main.cf the line
Bounces are sent fro
On January 28, 2004 12:48 pm, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
> ("mail from:<>"), and it sends them as they was from
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
> main.cf the line
Bounces are sent fro
It is an RFC requirement to accept <> as a valid MAIL FROM -- almost all
bounce messages use this as well as certain other circumstances, to
indicate they do not wish to receive a bounce message in the event of a
delivery error. I don't even think that postfix allows it to be turned off
at al
On Mi, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:48:54 +0100, TomÃs NÃÃez Lirola <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> RTFM'ing, I don't find any more option to reject this kind of senders, so I
> don't know what to do...
> Am I doing anything wrong? Can anyone please help me?
You must not reject messages with an empty e
Hi
My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
("mail from:<>"), and it sends them as they was from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
main.cf the line
'smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender'
thinking that "<>" is not
It is an RFC requirement to accept <> as a valid MAIL FROM -- almost all
bounce messages use this as well as certain other circumstances, to
indicate they do not wish to receive a bounce message in the event of a
delivery error. I don't even think that postfix allows it to be turned off
at al
On Mi, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:48:54 +0100, TomÃs NÃÃez Lirola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> RTFM'ing, I don't find any more option to reject this kind of senders, so I
> don't know what to do...
> Am I doing anything wrong? Can anyone please help me?
You must not reject messages with an empty en
Hi
My smtp server (postfix) was receiving a lot of mails with empty senders
("mail from:<>"), and it sends them as they was from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I want to change this behaviour, so I added to
main.cf the line
'smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_sender'
thinking that "<>" is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
