Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Wheeler
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote: > I'm about to install Debian on a new laptop that's going to be my primary > personal machine. I too have a similar setup. > I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting > on testing or unstable >From what you say, it sounds as i

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:18, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote: > I know this is a bit off-topic, but hope I can gather some opinions here. > I'm about to install Debian on a new laptop that's going to be my primary > personal machine. I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting > on tes

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Vicente Ferrando
Whether you decide to use testing or unestable, my suggestion is to install "apt-listbugs". This way you're informed of serius bugs in packages to be upgraded. And then apt will ask you if you realy want to upgrade the buggy package or not. On Wednesday 13 August 2003 15:18, John R. Ackermann N

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Wheeler
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote: > Um... So don't dist-upgrade right before you're demoing for clients? Precisely. (But I update every night via a cron job; and I can get called out at very short notice. Practically I suppose -- yeah, I *could* make it work. But I'm a sucker for stuff

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:42:36PM +, Martin Wheeler wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting > > on testing or unstable > > >From what you say, it sounds as if only unstable is going to give you the > latest ver

OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread John R. Ackermann N8UR
I know this is a bit off-topic, but hope I can gather some opinions here. I'm about to install Debian on a new laptop that's going to be my primary personal machine. I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting on testing or unstable (I use KDE, and stable still has the ancient versi

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:30:39PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > > To: Martin Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "John R. Ackermann N8UR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I just wanted to apologize for this, I am well awar

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > To: Martin Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "John R. Ackermann N8UR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just wanted to apologize for this, I am well aware of the policy on this mailing list. I have no excuse, I just didn't t

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Jon Wood
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 14:18, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote: > I know this is a bit off-topic, but hope I can gather some opinions here. > I'm about to install Debian on a new laptop that's going to be my primary > personal machine. I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting > on tes