On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 06:56:40PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:03:19AM +, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I doubt that Qmail is any more secure than Postfix. I doubt that it is any
> > faster.
>
> Well, postfix has had security bugs, qmail hasn't.
actually, the o
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 06:57:00PM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> Actually, I'd really want to know how to configure Postfix to
> add a header for each blocking service checked:
>
> X-Maybe-Spam-RBL: [the text from the TXT record here]
> Please tell me how to do it.
You can't.
Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> Actually, I'd really want to know how to configure Postfix to
> add a header for each blocking service checked:
>
> X-Maybe-Spam-RBL: [the text from the TXT record here]
> X-Maybe-Spam-ORBS: [the text from the TXT record here]
> X-Maybe-Spam-DUL: [the text from
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:03:19AM +, Russell Coker wrote:
> Also Qmail is lacking in functionality when compared to Postfix, Sendmail, or
> probably any other Unix mail server. Qmail is fast and reliable, it's good
> for installing for one of those clients who is expected to stuff up Postfix
4 matches
Mail list logo
