On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 at 14:50:30 +0200, Craig wrote:
> Hi Fellows
>
> Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
> to use on my mail server. Something that can take
> a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
> problems with it and qpopper I think has security
&g
* Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Apr 2002 08:50]:
> Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
> to use on my mail server. Something that can take
> a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
> problems with it and qpopper I think has security
> issues.
qmail comes wit
Hello "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I recommend courier-pop with Postfix or qmail, which give fine
performance and high flexibility.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:50:30 +0200
"Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fellows
>
> Has anyone got suggestions
Hi Fellows
Has anyone got suggestions on a good pop3 server
to use on my mail server. Something that can take
a hammering and not ipopd, been having some
problems with it and qpopper I think has security
issues.
Any help will be appreciated :)
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
ee, basically. Once you get through the not-so-good
documentation, you'll have a working system that just... works!
phil.
Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> (please send your mails in text only)
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:36:28 +0200, Javier Castillo Alcibar writes:
> > I am
(please send your mails in text only)
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:36:28 +0200, Javier Castillo Alcibar writes:
> I am looking for a good pop3 server in the woody(testing)
>distribution. I was going to install qpopper v4, but it runs from inetd
>daemon, what I think is a bad idea
Title: Good pop3 server
Hi all,
I am looking for a good pop3 server in the woody(testing) distribution. I was going to install qpopper v4, but it runs from inetd daemon, what I think is a bad idea from the performance point of view..
Any ideas??
Thanks
7 matches
Mail list logo
