Re: General Apache-Question

2002-08-02 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Fri, 02 Aug 2002 at 19:59:48 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 14:46 01/08/02 +0200 hat Jones Down geschrieben: [...] > >In other words, it´s redundant to have installed packages "apache" AND > >"apache-ssl"? > > NO, you can have only apache OR apache-SSL Do you mean that you can NOT have _b

Re: General Apache-Question

2002-08-02 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, Am 14:46 01/08/02 +0200 hat Jones Down geschrieben: > > >HI, >So if I want an ssl apache it´s ok to have package apache and >libapache-mod-ssl, right? YES >In other words, it´s redundant to have installed packages "apache" AND >"apache-ssl"? NO, you can have only apache OR apa

Re: General Apache-Question

2002-08-01 Thread Marcin Sochacki
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:46:08PM +0200, Jones Down wrote: > package apache-ssl is the apache with compiled in ssl statically? Yes. > package apache is apache build with module support? Yes. apache-ssl has module support, too. > So if I want an ssl apache it´s ok to have package apache

General Apache-Question

2002-08-01 Thread Jones Down
HI, as I want to switch a server from redhat to debian I am investigating the differences and want to ask a simple question: package apache-ssl is the apache with compiled in ssl statically? package apache is apache build with module support? So if I want an ssl apache it´s ok to have