Re: FTP Proxy

2002-02-18 Thread Michael Wood
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:43:54AM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > > > Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by > > preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS > > and active FTP to work well togeth

Re: FTP Proxy

2002-02-18 Thread Michael Wood
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:43:54AM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote: > On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > > > Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by > > preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS > > and active FTP to work

Re: FTP Proxy

2002-02-16 Thread Noel Koethe
On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by > preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS > and active FTP to work well together, so I've always > needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with

Re: FTP Proxy

2002-02-16 Thread Noel Koethe
On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote: > Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by > preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS > and active FTP to work well together, so I've always > needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with

FTP Proxy

2002-02-15 Thread Asher Densmore-Lynn
Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS and active FTP to work well together, so I've always needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with misconfigured sites that can't use passive connections. Any help

FTP Proxy

2002-02-15 Thread Asher Densmore-Lynn
Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS and active FTP to work well together, so I've always needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with misconfigured sites that can't use passive connections. Any help