On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:58, Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the
> verbal explanation is that the user is over quota.
5xx is the correct thing to do wh
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:58, Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the
> verbal explanation is that the user is over quota.
5xx is the correct thing to do wh
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:58:19AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >why should there be?
> > [...]
>
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the verbal
> explanation is that the user is over quota.
we
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:58:19AM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> >why should there be?
> > [...]
>
> Because, like you mentioned later in your message, not all mailers give
> proper responses. For example, I've see a lot of 5xx codes where the verbal
> explanation is that the user is over quota.
we
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some silly hard-coded failure ty
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some silly hard-coded failure t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
> remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
> delivery:
>
>550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>452 Mailbox
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
> remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
> delivery:
>
>550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
>452 Mailbox
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
delivery:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
452 Mailbox full
452 Insufficient disk space; try again later
421 Too many conc
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
delivery:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
452 Mailbox full
452 Insufficient disk space; try again later
421 Too many conc
10 matches
Mail list logo
