On Friday 10 December 2004 09:36, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> (1) If SPF HELO checking is on and lookup matches connecting IP
> --> PASS
[..]
> Otherwise, return 517 HELO $hostname does not match $remote-ip
Sorry to reply to myself, but this sequence is more complicated if SPF
checking is turned
[CC'ing Bill Taroli who has been helping me with this on courier-user]
On Friday 10 December 2004 07:08, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 10 December 2004 00:39, Mark Bucciarelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I've recently turned on EHLO/HELO validation and am encouraged by how
> > effectiv
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I tried out "reject_unknown_hostname" but had to turn it off, too many
> machines had unknown hostnames.
>
> For example a zone foo.com has a SMTP server named postfix1 and puts
> postfix1.foo.com in the EHLO command but has an extern
On Friday 10 December 2004 00:39, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've recently turned on EHLO/HELO validation and am encouraged by how
> effective it is. WIth RBL's (spamcop and dnsbl) and SpamAssassin 3, only
> 88% of spam was stopped. So far, it's 100%. (This is a _very_ small
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 17:55, Michael Loftis wrote:
> --On Wednesday, December 08, 2004 08:47 +1100 Craig Sanders
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Now I reject by 554 code... should I change to 4xx?
> >
> > if it suits your needs. i wouldn't.
>
> I have to agree with that statement. For
5 matches
Mail list logo
