On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:49:35 -0400, Alec wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> begin quotation of Arnt Karlsen:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:48:36 +0200, Christian wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > not a trojan-winXP-desktop
> >
> > ..how does these act, one shot, or all
backports.org has a 2.1.4 backport currently.
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 00:07 +1000 Russell Coker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:51, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, it requires postfix' policy server which is only available in
postf
I use the backport from backports.org for the policy server on a couple of
machines, not for the greylisting, but to check the status of domain controllers
that provide username services via winbind (samba 3 version, also from
backports)... (winbind returns user not found when the domain is down, b
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:51, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, it requires postfix' policy server which is only available in
> postfix 2.1.
I think I'll give up on back-porting it. Back-porting Postfix 2.0.16 was
enough pain. I guess I'll just have to move u
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 15.23, Russell Coker wrote:
> Hmm, the postgrey package is not available for woody (no great
> surprise I guess), I'll have to back-port it.
I guess you saw my other message by now - written in the apparently
mistaken assumption that you probably knew what greylisting is.
begin quotation of Arnt Karlsen:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:48:36 +0200, Christian wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > not a trojan-winXP-desktop
>
> ..how does these act, one shot, or all the time?
Those act as a continuous one-shot deal; to put it another way, they
aren't listeni
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:48:36 +0200, Christian wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> not a trojan-winXP-desktop
..how does these act, one shot, or all the time?
..how are such Wintendos best shot down?
(Where it's legal to shoot them down. Some jurisdictions
allow forcibly preventing crime
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:48, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-07-20 Russell Coker wrote:
> > (host mail3av.westend.com[212.117.79.67] said: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 300 seconds... (in reply to >
Hello
On 2004-07-20 Russell Coker wrote:
> (host mail3av.westend.com[212.117.79.67] said: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 300 seconds... (in reply to > RCPT TO
> command)) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Christian's mail server is broken.
Err, no. It's not a bug it
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:06:01 +1000, Russell Coker writes:
>(host mail3av.westend.com[212.117.79.67] said: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 300 seconds... (in reply to RCPT
>TO command)) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Christian's mail server is broken.
Why would you co
(host mail3av.westend.com[212.117.79.67] said: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 300 seconds... (in reply to RCPT
TO command)) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian's mail server is broken.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
h
11 matches
Mail list logo
