Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:06:02AM -0500, Chuck Peters wrote: > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > them or comments on the performance and reliablity? If you plan to monitor your devi

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:06:02AM -0500, Chuck Peters wrote: > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > them or comments on the performance and reliablity? If you plan to monitor your dev

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Teun Vink
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:06, Teun Vink wrote: > > [...] > > Frankly, I'm not too happy about both. The TC still has some unexplained > > problems, which couldn't be solved by their tech support. The only way we > > could keep the machine running, was by shut

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:06, Teun Vink wrote: > > I suggest getting a Cyclades card and running Portslave the machine that > > has it. It allows PPP, SLIP, telnet, rsh, and ssh connections from the > > terminal server to a specified machine (controlled by RADIUS). > > At the ISP I work at, we used to

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Teun Vink
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 06:06, Chuck Peters wrote: > > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > > them or comments on the performance and reliablity?

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 06:06, Chuck Peters wrote: > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > them or comments on the performance and reliablity? A google search on "USR Total Control" turns up

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Teun Vink
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:06, Teun Vink wrote: > > [...] > > Frankly, I'm not too happy about both. The TC still has some unexplained > > problems, which couldn't be solved by their tech support. The only way we > > could keep the machine running, was by shu

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:06, Teun Vink wrote: > > I suggest getting a Cyclades card and running Portslave the machine that > > has it. It allows PPP, SLIP, telnet, rsh, and ssh connections from the > > terminal server to a specified machine (controlled by RADIUS). > > At the ISP I work at, we used t

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Teun Vink
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 06:06, Chuck Peters wrote: > > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > > them or comments on the performance and reliablity

Re: 56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 06:06, Chuck Peters wrote: > One of our Network Admins Eric likes the USR Total Control and says we can > pick up a used one for a good price. Does anyone have experience with > them or comments on the performance and reliablity? A google search on "USR Total Control" turns up

56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-05 Thread Chuck Peters
CCIL.org, a non-profit freenet, is finally getting around to wanting 56K dialup. A big part of the board wanting it now is our per line cost will be cheaper and they want to double the number of users in 2002. Too bad they want all this done with declining donations. One of our Network Admins Er

56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-05 Thread Chuck Peters
CCIL.org, a non-profit freenet, is finally getting around to wanting 56K dialup. A big part of the board wanting it now is our per line cost will be cheaper and they want to double the number of users in 2002. Too bad they want all this done with declining donations. One of our Network Admins E