TECTED]
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 13:50, Peter King wrote:
> Is it possible to set-up auth smtp using sendmail in debian?
>
> I have a mail server with sendmail installed (and openprotect).
>
> I would like to set-up authenticated smtp so that users can send email
> through this
On Di, 21.12.2004, 14:50, Peter King sagte:
> Is it possible to set-up auth smtp using sendmail in debian?
>
> I have a mail server with sendmail installed (and openprotect).
>
> I would like to set-up authenticated smtp so that users can send email
> through this server by au
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 13:50, Peter King wrote:
> Is it possible to set-up auth smtp using sendmail in debian?
>
> I have a mail server with sendmail installed (and openprotect).
>
> I would like to set-up authenticated smtp so that users can send email
> through this server
Is it possible to set-up auth smtp using sendmail in debian?
I have a mail server with sendmail installed (and openprotect).
I would like to set-up authenticated smtp so that users can send email
through this server by authenticating first.
All the users have pop3 accounts on the server.
How
Penbrock wrote:
> Thanks alot I now have MailScanner scanning all my messages :). How ever I
> have one minor(?) problem, sendmail movers messages to the mqueue.in ,
> MailScanner scans them and moves them to the /mqueue like it should,...
> but the messages just sit there. Do I
Thanks alot I now have MailScanner scanning all my messages :). How ever I
have one minor(?) problem, sendmail movers messages to the mqueue.in ,
MailScanner scans them and moves them to the /mqueue like it should,...
but the messages just sit there. Do I now need to change procmail
ilScanner. I think I have it all installed on my testing system
> how ever I can not find any Doc's on how to tell Sendmail to start calling
> MailScanner. Can anyone help me out here or direct me to some doc's on
> using it on a Debian server with Sendmail?
>
> Thanks for a
how ever I can not find any Doc's on how to tell
Sendmail to start calling MailScanner. Can anyone help me out here or direct me
to some doc's on using it on a Debian server with Sendmail?
Thanks for any
direction you can give this old MS user trying to learn
Linux
Ken
I am trying to resolve an error message I am seeing on some mail passing
through my external mail server, running mimedefang 2.39 and sendmail
8.12.3 to our internal mail server.
Users are seeing the following message in their mailbox:
"<<< no Message Collected >>>"
Am 2004-05-25 13:17:25, schrieb Tomàs Núñez:
>Well... as this is an option, I think it may not be correct to accept all
>mail... This way, If someone mispells some address, he will think the mail
>arrived correctly as no error message come back...
I think, you aren not responsable for misselle
Am 2004-05-25 13:17:25, schrieb Tomàs Núñez:
>Well... as this is an option, I think it may not be correct to accept all
>mail... This way, If someone mispells some address, he will think the mail
>arrived correctly as no error message come back...
I think, you aren not responsable for misselle
On 27/05/2004, at 11:42 PM, Tomàs Núñez wrote:
This works pretty well... but it seems that pcre aliases have higher
priority
than ldap aliases... Every time I send something to an email that is
aliased
in the pcre file, it is sent to the pcre alias. It doesn't matter if I
put
pcre at the beginni
On 27/05/2004, at 11:42 PM, Tomàs Núñez wrote:
This works pretty well... but it seems that pcre aliases have higher
priority
than ldap aliases... Every time I send something to an email that is
aliased
in the pcre file, it is sent to the pcre alias. It doesn't matter if I
put
pcre at the beginni
El Jueves, 27 de Mayo de 2004 06:48, Corey Ralph escribió:
> Tomàs Núñez wrote:
> > On the sendmail server I have some "aliases", I mean, some accounts from
> > what I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of
> > this machine). One utility
El Jueves, 27 de Mayo de 2004 06:48, Corey Ralph escribió:
> Tomàs Núñez wrote:
> > On the sendmail server I have some "aliases", I mean, some accounts from
> > what I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of
> > this machine). One utility
Tomàs Núñez wrote:
On the sendmail server I have some "aliases", I mean, some accounts from what
I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of this
machine). One utility of this was that I received all "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
without having to configure
Tomàs Núñez wrote:
On the sendmail server I have some "aliases", I mean, some accounts from what
I receive mail no matter which domain is sent to (being a domain of this
machine). One utility of this was that I received all "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
without having to configure
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió:
>
> How about option 3...
>
> Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other
> rubbish...
>
> @domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses
> befo
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Tom?s N??ez wrote:
> Hi
> I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
> sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
> spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap
Hi
I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing
this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió:
>
> How about option 3...
>
> Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other
> rubbish...
>
> @domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses
> befo
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Tom?s N??ez wrote:
> Hi
> I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
> sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
> spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap
Hi
I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a
sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd +
spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing
this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt
Dirk Tamme said:
> The solution was to install mod_perl:
>
> cd /usr/local/src
> wget http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod.perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
> tar -xzf mod.perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
> cd /usr/local/src/mod_perl-1.29
> perl Makefile.PL NO_HTTPD=1
> make
> make install
Just install it from apt, via:
Dirk Tamme said:
> The solution was to install mod_perl:
>
> cd /usr/local/src
> wget http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod.perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
> tar -xzf mod.perl-1.0-current.tar.gz
> cd /usr/local/src/mod_perl-1.29
> perl Makefile.PL NO_HTTPD=1
> make
> make install
Just install it from apt, via:
Dirk Tamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and I
> want to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
> To install Sendmail::Milter, I had done the following:
Are you aware of libsendmail-milter-perl's existence?
-Hilko
Dirk Tamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and I
> want to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
> To install Sendmail::Milter, I had done the following:
Are you aware of libsendmail-milter-perl's ex
Hello,
my problem was that my Perl-Script with Sendmail::Milter gave the error
message
/usr/bin/perl: relocation error:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/auto/Sendmail/Milter/Milter.so:
undefined symbol: smfi_setconn
The solution was to install mod_perl:
cd /usr/local/src
Hello,
my problem was that my Perl-Script with Sendmail::Milter gave the error
message
/usr/bin/perl: relocation error:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/auto/Sendmail/Milter/Milter.so:
undefined symbol: smfi_setconn
The solution was to install mod_perl:
cd /usr/local
hich provides a nice way to
use it via perl.
Thank you for suggesting MIMEdefang. Nevertheless, I'm looking for a
solution of my original problem:
It is the error message
/usr/bin/perl: relocation error:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/auto/Sendmail/Milter/M
hich provides a nice way to
use it via perl.
Thank you for suggesting MIMEdefang. Nevertheless, I'm looking for a
solution of my original problem:
It is the error message
/usr/bin/perl: relocation error:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i586-linux-thread-multi/auto/Sendmail/Milter/M
I've also had a lot of success using mimefang on our external mail server
I've also had a lot of success using mimefang on our external mail server.
It's easy to configure for any of your mail filtering needs.
Bojens, Kai said:
> I don't have a solution for your particular problem but i am using
> the milter interface via MIMEdefang which provides a nice way to
> use it
Hi.
> I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and
> I want to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
I don't have a solution for your particular problem but i am using
the milter interface via MIMEdefang which provides a nice way to
use it via perl.
W
Hi.
> I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and
> I want to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
I don't have a solution for your particular problem but i am using
the milter interface via MIMEdefang which provides a nice way to
use it via perl.
W
Hello,
I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and I want
to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
To install Sendmail::Milter, I had done the following:
cd /usr/local/src/Sendmail-Milter-0.18
perl Makefile.PL /usr/local/src/sendmail-8.12.11\
/usr/local/src/sen
Hello,
I'm using sendmail 8.12.11 ( including the Milter interface), and I want
to use the Perl interface Sendmail::Milter.
To install Sendmail::Milter, I had done the following:
cd /usr/local/src/Sendmail-Milter-0.18
perl Makefile.PL /usr/local/src/sendmail-8.12.11\
/usr/local/src/sen
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
> How to do it with sendmail:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
I was trying to stay away from pam-ldap - wa
I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
How to do it with sendmail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "de
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
> How to do it with sendmail:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
I was trying to stay away from pam-ldap - wa
I would suggest to use 'pam_ldap.so' from 'libpam-ldap' via sasl.
How to do it with sendmail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "deb
Hello all,
Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server? We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
ag
Hello all,
Does anyone know if sendmail can do authentication against an LDAP
server? We are getting ready to change which box is being used for
outgoing mail, and since outgoing mail is only allowed either from the
client's subnet or via auth, it would be nice if we could authenticate
ag
This one time, at band camp, Jon Hoffman said:
> I don't have a spare machine to test right now but I
> have seen a similar setup before, so I'll take a stab
> from memory. If this works post it to the list, I
> don't like posting un-tested configs.
>
> You might want to start by making sure you d
This one time, at band camp, Jon Hoffman said:
> I don't have a spare machine to test right now but I
> have seen a similar setup before, so I'll take a stab
> from memory. If this works post it to the list, I
> don't like posting un-tested configs.
>
> You might want to start by making sure you d
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> Here some straightforward methods for sendmail:
>
> You want to restrict to some IP's?
>
> local-host-names:
> 10.0.0
> 192.168
> 127.1.2.3
Sure, but this doesn't stop incoming mail addressed to this hos
This one time, at band camp, Christian Storch said:
> Here some straightforward methods for sendmail:
>
> You want to restrict to some IP's?
>
> local-host-names:
> 10.0.0
> 192.168
> 127.1.2.3
Sure, but this doesn't stop incoming mail addressed to this hos
Here some straightforward methods for sendmail:
You want to restrict to some IP's?
local-host-names:
10.0.0
192.168
127.1.2.3
...
(You don't need sendmailconfig here!)
Or to authenticated users?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
Christian
---
Here some straightforward methods for sendmail:
You want to restrict to some IP's?
local-host-names:
10.0.0
192.168
127.1.2.3
...
(You don't need sendmailconfig here!)
Or to authenticated users?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2004/debian-isp-200402/msg00267.html
Christian
---
rrive there, only spams and viruses
> and whatnot. However, any mail that arrives for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> accepted, since sendmail knows that it _is_ mail.foo.com. I want to
> reject these, and only accept mail that is authed, or coming in through
> one of the frontend machines. I c
rrive there, only spams and viruses
> and whatnot. However, any mail that arrives for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> accepted, since sendmail knows that it _is_ mail.foo.com. I want to
> reject these, and only accept mail that is authed, or coming in through
> one of the frontend machines. I c
: OK # front-end machine 2
>
> OK. You'll want to add localhost and 127.0.0.1:
>
> localhost.localdomain RELAY
> localhost RELAY
> 127.0.0.1 RELAY
That is quite helpful, thanks.
> otherwise locally-generated mail will fail. Unless you've
: OK # front-end machine 2
>
> OK. You'll want to add localhost and 127.0.0.1:
>
> localhost.localdomain RELAY
> localhost RELAY
> 127.0.0.1 RELAY
That is quite helpful, thanks.
> otherwise locally-generated mail will fail. Unless you've
.0.0.1:
localhost.localdomain RELAY
localhost RELAY
127.0.0.1 RELAY
otherwise locally-generated mail will fail. Unless you've got a good
reason NOT to trust localhost, any sendmail access map should include
these or similar lines- the last one is probably all that&
.0.0.1:
localhost.localdomain RELAY
localhost RELAY
127.0.0.1 RELAY
otherwise locally-generated mail will fail. Unless you've got a good
reason NOT to trust localhost, any sendmail access map should include
these or similar lines- the last one is probably all that&
Hello all,
We're in the process of locking down access to various services on a
network, and one of the things we want to do is lock down sendmail a
little. We are migrating a box from being the front-end mail machine,
with the SASL database and all of the other user info on it, to be
Hello all,
We're in the process of locking down access to various services on a
network, and one of the things we want to do is lock down sendmail a
little. We are migrating a box from being the front-end mail machine,
with the SASL database and all of the other user info on it, to be
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
> I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
> how you did it.
> I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
> and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, autobalanced cluster? Inter
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresources files l
El vie, 05-03-2004 a las 12:56, Lucius Junevicus escribió:
> I saw your post on setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see
> how you did it.
> I'd like to create a how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix
> and drbd) for qmail.
Open Mosix? Isnt that like, autobalanced cluster? Inter
Title: Message
I saw your post on
setting up qmail over drbd. I would love to see how you did
it.
I'd like to create a
how-to on setting up a hybrid cluster (open-mosix and drbd) for
qmail.
I'd love to know how
you setup your cluster.
What do your
drbd.conf, ha.cf, haresources files l
>
> Hi all
>
> I need to let sendmail authenticate from a different passwd file, let me
> explain.
> Sendmail currently authenticates from /etc/passwd I would like it to use
> /etc/mailpass as step one and then to authenticate from berkleydb
> later on
> when I have veri
>
> Hi all
>
> I need to let sendmail authenticate from a different passwd file, let me
> explain.
> Sendmail currently authenticates from /etc/passwd I would like it to use
> /etc/mailpass as step one and then to authenticate from berkleydb
> later on
> when I have veri
The follwowing was tested in stable and unstable with sendmail:
For plain text (in an internal sense not - what you would see
over the network!) you'll need the package
libsasl-modules-plain
Then append
ESASL_PATH=/usr/lib/sasl
to 'sendmail.mc'. Create '/usr/lib/sasl/Sendm
Hi all
I need to let sendmail authenticate from a different passwd file, let me
explain.
Sendmail currently authenticates from /etc/passwd I would like it to use
/etc/mailpass as step one and then to authenticate from berkleydb later on
when I have verified that evereything works.
Qpopper also
ackage maintainer to have this defaulted to 'no', but I'm unsure if
> he'll act on it.
>
> Finally, if you use sendmail, you'll need to setup two daemons, one to
> send the inbound mail through to a queue directory for MailScanner, and
> another to deliver
package maintainer to have this defaulted to 'no', but I'm unsure if
he'll act on it.
Finally, if you use sendmail, you'll need to setup two daemons, one to
send the inbound mail through to a queue directory for MailScanner, and
another to deliver once mailscanner is
the package maintainer to have this defaulted to 'no', but I'm unsure if he'll act on it.
Finally, if you use sendmail, you'll need to setup two daemons, one to send the inbound mail through to a queue directory for MailScanner, and another to deliver once mailscanner is
Hi
We are setting up a Mailhub for our hosting clients, want to send mail to
our Debian box, Woody with BF4, and then redirect mail to the hosting/email
servers (we use Cobalt Raq's for the clients.)
We installed sendmail from stable, Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from Testing
usin
Hi
We are setting up a Mailhub for our hosting clients, want to send mail to
our Debian box, Woody with BF4, and then redirect mail to the hosting/email
servers (we use Cobalt Raq's for the clients.)
We installed sendmail from stable, Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from Testing
usin
a
sendmail server. My original plan is to have it as a very high mx number
like 99 and just verify it appears to be working on the few MTA's that
attempt to relay through it.
Am I missing any additional items I need to configure to keep addresses
carrying over correctly to their destin
a
sendmail server. My original plan is to have it as a very high mx number
like 99 and just verify it appears to be working on the few MTA's that
attempt to relay through it.
Am I missing any additional items I need to configure to keep addresses
carrying over correctly to their destin
Anyone seen any odd queuing by Sendmail (or the ability to change how it
queues)?
Say the primary MX for a host is down and we attempt to send mail to a
domain that it handles mail for. For example:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX 100 mail.wam.net.
necinc.com
Anyone seen any odd queuing by Sendmail (or the ability to change how it
queues)?
Say the primary MX for a host is down and we attempt to send mail to a
domain that it handles mail for. For example:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
necinc.com. 19h32m42s IN MX 100 mail.wam.net.
necinc.com
Jason McMullen wrote:
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks an
Jason McMullen wrote:
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks an
Jason,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Jason McMullen wrote:
>
> I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
> "front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
> mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping
Jason,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Jason McMullen wrote:
>
> I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
> "front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
> mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks and whatnot. The problem
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks and whatnot. The problem
first step.
Cheers
jody
regards,
-rodi
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:52, Jody Grafals wrote:
Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
Is it possible to somehow use my Debian Linux server as a tool to
download pop mail from a remote server then forward it to my local mail
server (Exchange), I was t
a Windows based network... I'm
not sure if it comes with anything other than the Small Business Server version
of 2k server though.
Jon
> regards,
> -rodi
>
>
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:52, Jody Grafals wrote:
> > Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
> >
> > I
doesn't exchange come with some pop-connector tool to download mail from
a pop-server? i know it's not the coolest solution, though i believe it
works ;-)
regards,
-rodi
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:52, Jody Grafals wrote:
> Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
>
> Is it possibl
box, which
I've also done, and much as the docs say, really don't like too much.
Fetchmail can either run sendmail (ie, the "sendmail" command that is used for
most on the server mtas) or forward direct via smtp to wherever you want
(including straight into an exchange smtp ser
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:49:21 -0400,
Jody Grafals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yreka - So I could use fetchmail to get the mail form the pop account
> then use sendmail to the exchange server - Can this be automated out
> of the box or will
Yreka - So I could use fetchmail to get the mail form the pop account
then use sendmail to the exchange server - Can this be automated out of
the box or will it invlove scripting and is it a piratical solution for
auto relaying 50 mailboxes Or am I making this to complicated. Is there
some
- Original Message -
From: "Jody Grafals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
> Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
>
> Is it possible to somehow use my D
Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
Is it possible to somehow use my Debian Linux server as a tool to
download pop mail from a remote server then forward it to my local mail
server (Exchange), I was thinking Sendmail might be able to do something
like this but I could not find any
Hi,
Does anyone know if the new Sendmail bug:
http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
affects 8.11.x? I have a few non-Debian boxes still running 8.11.7 (the
3/31 patch didn't bump the version number), and I haven't been able to
find any specific info.
Thanks,
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:54:07 +1000,
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:01, Rich Puhek wrote:
> > Ted will know a lot more about this than I do, but I'd think that if
> > the first two superblocks are corrupt, the likelihood of superbl
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:01, Rich Puhek wrote:
> Ted will know a lot more about this than I do, but I'd think that if the
> first two superblocks are corrupt, the likelihood of superblock number 3
> or whatever being good is pretty low compared to the odds that the
> drive/parition is shot. Perhaps t
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..and after a journal death, and fsck, the raid set will be able
to re-establish itself, no? Or does the journal do both/all disks
in a raid set?
The FS doesn't know or care about RAID-anything, as far as I know.
Doesn't the FS just tell /dev/hda1, /dev/sda1, or /dev/m
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:03:17 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:04:19AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
> >
> > ..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
>
> If you have rand
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:04:19AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
>
> ..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
If you have random disk corruptions happening as often as you are, no
filesystem is going to be able to help you. The only question is how
Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.09.10 20:16]:
Also you can't have a ReiserFS file system mounted read-only while fsck'ing
it. Which makes recovering errors on the root FS very interesting to say the
least.
What I hate about ext3 is that it doesn't poorly handles
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:22, Cameron Moore wrote:
> > Having a file system decide to panic the kernel because your mount
> > options instructed it to (ext3) is one thing. Having the file system
> > driver corrupt random kernel memory and cause an Oops (Reiser) is
> > another. The ReiserFS team's re
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.09.10 20:16]:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:04, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
> > ..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
>
> ReiserFS has many situations where file system corruption can make operations
> such as "find
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:04, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs???
>
> ..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare?
ReiserFS has many situations where file system corruption can make operations
such as "find /" trigger a kernel Oops.
Having a file system decide to panic th
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:39:44 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:36:32AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > But for an unattended server, most of the time it's probably
> > > better to force the system to reboot so you can res
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:36:32AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > But for an unattended server, most of the time it's probably better to
> > force the system to reboot so you can restore service ASAP.
>
> ..even for raid-1 disks??? _Is_ there a combination of raid-1 and
> journalling fs'es for l
1 - 100 of 462 matches
Mail list logo
