Re: work but http://www.domain.com/file"> not work

2002-12-24 Thread Christian Hammers
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 04:51:04AM -0700, eric lin wrote: > Do you know why in the html code to show photo by > http://12.34.56.78/photo.gif or jpg"> work but > http://www.domain.com/photo.gif or jpg"> not work? There are several web servers running on the host that has

Re: work but http://www.domain.com/file">not work

2002-12-24 Thread Thomas Braun
eric lin wrote: Dear advancers: Do you know why in the html code to show photo by http://12.34.56.78/photo.gif or jpg"> work but http://www.domain.com/photo.gif or jpg"> not work? Do you can resolve www.domain.com on the computer? cu thomas highly appreciate your

Re: work but http://www.domain.com/file">not work

2002-12-23 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, eric lin wrote: > Dear advancers: > >Do you know why in the html code to show photo by > http://12.34.56.78/photo.gif or jpg"> work but > http://www.domain.com/photo.gif or jpg"> not work? > Yes. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECT

work but http://www.domain.com/file">not work

2002-12-23 Thread eric lin
Dear advancers: Do you know why in the html code to show photo by http://12.34.56.78/photo.gif or jpg"> work but http://www.domain.com/photo.gif or jpg"> not work? highly appreciate your help -- Sincere Eric www.linuxspice.com linux pc for sale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: not work,

2002-12-23 Thread Brad Lay
telnet localhost 80 GET /file HTTP/1.0 (Thats ENTER, ENTER.) What happens then? Look in the access.log and error.log as well. You might want to tag a | less on the end of the telnet line, if you need to scroll. Try that and see what happens. -- Brad Lay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Systems Administr

Re: not work,

2002-12-23 Thread eric lin
Thomas Braun wrote: eric lin wrote: www:/home/fsshl# iptables -L -nv Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destinat

Re: not work,

2002-12-23 Thread Thomas Braun
eric lin wrote: www:/home/fsshl# iptables -L -nv Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (poli

Re: [Fwd: Re: not work,]

2002-12-22 Thread eric lin
Dear Bill or any linuxer: I think what I miss is port-forwarding, (if I guess is not correct please justify me) hope to see your advice and hlep again, and thanks in advance Bill Moseley wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, eric lin wrote: www:/home/fsshl# iptables -L -nv Chain INPUT (policy AC

Re: not work,

2002-12-22 Thread eric lin
www:/home/fsshl# iptables -L -nv Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 pack

Re: not work,

2002-12-22 Thread Simon Bland
I'm really not sure on that, I generally use iptables, independent of a specific firewall package. If you are using an iptables one, try: iptables -L -nv This will give a dump of all the loaded rules, if that doesn't work, well I'm not 100% up on ipchains.. Remember to CC your replies to the de

Re: not work,

2002-12-22 Thread Simon Bland
Okay, your apache bind looks fine, and if your ISP claims not to block your port 80 traffic, then perhaps your own firewall may be causing the problem. What are you using to do the firewall? On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 12:37:59AM -0700, eric lin wrote: > -- > >

not work,

2002-12-22 Thread eric lin
Dear debian isp: I am using Debain progeny on 2.4.20, my question in hyper link to access my site 's photo or file work, but directly show pic by putting a code http://ippath/photo.jpg";> not work, so I have to took off the http://ippath/ and copy my photo.jpg to /var/www/ di

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

2002-01-31 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:44:48PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > I have a Debian router which connects to an ADSL/PPPoE line (therefore > with a PPP interface and a MTU of 1492). > > Behind it are Linux machines, MS-Windows boxes and

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

2002-01-30 Thread Jeremy Lunn
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:37:33PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > but if NAT gw machine has MTU already set do 1492, then there is no need for > > "NATed" clients to change MTU. That's only if you use MSS clamping. > > i call pppoe with "-m 1412". if this helps you... > > The MTU of the

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

2002-01-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:44:17PM +0100, jernej horvat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > but if NAT gw machine has MTU already set do 1492, then there is no need for > "NATed" clients to change MTU. Are you sure? Because NAT does not change the packet size. If I

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

2002-01-30 Thread jernej horvat
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 17:44, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > It seems clearly MTU-related. but if NAT gw machine has MTU already set do 1492, then there is no need for "NATed" clients to change MTU. i call pppoe with "-m 1412". if this helps you... -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

2002-01-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
I have a Debian router which connects to an ADSL/PPPoE line (therefore with a PPP interface and a MTU of 1492). Behind it are Linux machines, MS-Windows boxes and MacOS toys, all NATed (i have only one IP address) by Netfilter/iptables (router kernel is 2.4.7). The two first categories have no pr