Hi all,
ok I am starting to get a bit further -
If I log in on the console, I get a max processes of 7168
If I log in via telnet (installed for the test) I get 7168
If I have a cronjob that 'ulimit -a >> /tmp/ulimit' I get 7168
If I edit /etc/init.d/rc and add a 'ulimit -a > /ulimit.txt' I get 7168
Hi all,
ok I am starting to get a bit further -
If I log in on the console, I get a max processes of 7168
If I log in via telnet (installed for the test) I get 7168
If I have a cronjob that 'ulimit -a >> /tmp/ulimit' I get 7168
If I edit /etc/init.d/rc and add a 'ulimit -a > /ulimit.txt' I get 7168
The box with 7168 is installed from a NetInstall Debian CD.
The box with 256 is installed via PXE Boot using a copied filesystem from
a box installed with the SAME NetInstall Debian CD.
Both boxes are initially installed with WOODY, using the bf24 kernel.
Regards
Andrew
> Andrew: Did you upgrad
The box with 7168 is installed from a NetInstall Debian CD.
The box with 256 is installed via PXE Boot using a copied filesystem from
a box installed with the SAME NetInstall Debian CD.
Both boxes are initially installed with WOODY, using the bf24 kernel.
Regards
Andrew
> Andrew: Did you upgrad
Hector Gonzalez wrote:
are you using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
Together with andrews information (--get-selections say: same pachages
installed) I would assume that on of the boxes had a 2.2.x before an for
Hector Gonzalez wrote:
are you using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
Together with andrews information (--get-selections say: same pachages
installed) I would assume that on of the boxes had a 2.2.x before an for
I have installed the SAME packages with dpkg --set-selections on two boxes
with a self compiled kernel 2.4.25-p4smp.
One has 256, one has 7168
WHERE is the 256 coming from - I have looked everywhere - even compared
etc, lib dirs etc... I just dont understand!!!
Thanks
Andrew
>
> are you using t
I have installed the SAME packages with dpkg --set-selections on two boxes
with a self compiled kernel 2.4.25-p4smp.
One has 256, one has 7168
WHERE is the 256 coming from - I have looked everywhere - even compared
etc, lib dirs etc... I just dont understand!!!
Thanks
Andrew
>
> are you using t
are you using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
are you using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
Hi,
I checked on 7 debian (woody) server compaq , all with kernel 2.4.24
(same build).
- in 2 servers I find 4095 (no the same hardware)
- in one 3075
- in other one 1024
!!???!!! sorry not answer of this question !
Mat
>>> "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/18/04 2:05 PM >>>
Andrea
Andreas John wrote:
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits
Hi,
I checked on 7 debian (woody) server compaq , all with kernel 2.4.24
(same build).
- in 2 servers I find 4095 (no the same hardware)
- in one 3075
- in other one 1024
!!???!!! sorry not answer of this question !
Mat
>>> "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/18/04 2:05 PM >>>
Andrea
Hi!
Do you have some security-enhancement packages installed on www01?
I could imagine (i.e. don't know :-)) that stuff like selinux decreases
umlimits on kernel compile time. Or maybe some uml or virtual
hosts/machine package installed for hosting customers?
rgds,
j.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
Hi Phil
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits.conf.develop /etc/s
Andreas John wrote:
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits
Hi!
Do you have some security-enhancement packages installed on www01?
I could imagine (i.e. don't know :-)) that stuff like selinux decreases
umlimits on kernel compile time. Or maybe some uml or virtual
hosts/machine package installed for hosting customers?
rgds,
j.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
Hi Phil
ROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:06 AM
Subject: [mailinglists] Ulimit and max processes
Dear list,
I am confused... I am running two debian boxes with woody,
but one has a ulimit -u (max user proc) of 7168, and the other of 256.
(both as root) the difference does not appear to
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits.conf.develop /etc/s
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 1:06 AM
Subject: [mailinglists] Ulimit and max processes
Dear list,
I am confused... I am running two debian boxes with woody,
but one has a ulimit -u (max user proc) of 7168, and the other of 256.
(both as root) the diff
20 matches
Mail list logo
