Re: sendmail or qmail or what?

2003-06-06 Thread Sis
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Ariel Graneros wrote: > I prefer postfix, it is rock solid everywhere i use it, has fewer security > issues than sendmail, is quite powerful, and the best of all, is veery easy > to configure. Anyway, i've never tried anything else. > > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:10:17 -0300 > "A

Re: sendmail or qmail or what?

2003-06-06 Thread Sis
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Ariel Graneros wrote: > I prefer postfix, it is rock solid everywhere i use it, has fewer security issues > than sendmail, is quite powerful, and the best of all, is veery easy to configure. > Anyway, i've never tried anything else. > > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:10:17 -0300 > "A

Help. Looking for FTP solution for multiple clients.

2003-05-19 Thread Sis
I am looking for a solution that may already exist. I have a client that i am VirtualHosting. The client is a business that accepts very large files from their clients. They had everyone just dump into one big FTP location but all of them were stealing each others' files. :( I modified a

Re: seeking input on rbls and anti-spam measures

2003-03-04 Thread Sis
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > I use a program that does that to complement qmail's standard measures, >... > The attached perl script is intended to be used in a .qmail delivery >... > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > # > # RCVCHK (C) 2002 Emile van Bergen. Redistributi

Re: seeking input on rbls and anti-spam measures

2003-03-04 Thread Sis
> I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully > enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly > lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again. I believe they all have a degree of "elasticity". I mean, they all have some mecha

Re: seeking input on rbls and anti-spam measures

2003-03-04 Thread Sis
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > I use a program that does that to complement qmail's standard measures, >... > The attached perl script is intended to be used in a .qmail delivery >... > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > # > # RCVCHK (C) 2002 Emile van Bergen. Redistributi

Re: seeking input on rbls and anti-spam measures

2003-03-04 Thread Sis
> I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully > enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly > lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again. I believe they all have a degree of "elasticity". I mean, they all have some mecha

Re: Cracking attempt

2003-02-23 Thread Sis
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:36:05PM -0600, Rod Rodolico wrote: > Ok, the other day someone scanned the ports from 3102 to 3230 on my > server. My firewall picked it up and told me about it. I have the > originating IP, date/time, etc... > > Question: What do you suggest I do about it? I've already

Re: Denial of Service via UCE

2003-01-29 Thread sis
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:52:18PM +1300, Pulu 'Anau wrote: >... > I take care of an email system for a high school in the Kingdom of tonga. > They're on a 32K link. Recently, some unknown purveyor of evil (Spam > Company) has decided to start sending large amounts of spam about various > penny s

Re: SPAM

2000-03-01 Thread Sis
actually being listed. Maybe i'm being really naive. Maybe my estimate of the size of the project is crazy? Maybe this is more of an invasion of privacy then i can think of? Any thoughts on this? sis