> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:22:03PM -0700, peace
> bwitchu penned:
> > The fix has been fixed as 2.4.21-rc4 I believe.
> The
> > original patch by redhat was in 2.4.21-rc3
>
> But this fix was reported to break something else.
> The fixed fix :-)
> is in 2.
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:22:03PM -0700, peace
> bwitchu penned:
> > The fix has been fixed as 2.4.21-rc4 I believe.
> The
> > original patch by redhat was in 2.4.21-rc3
>
> But this fix was reported to break something else.
> The fixed fix :-)
> is in 2.
The fix has been fixed as 2.4.21-rc4 I believe. The
original patch by redhat was in 2.4.21-rc3
Peace
--- Peter Billson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas,
> My brother tells me that there has been some
> discussion about this on
> the kernel list. RedHat's patch was applied to
> 2.4.21 (plus
The fix has been fixed as 2.4.21-rc4 I believe. The
original patch by redhat was in 2.4.21-rc3
Peace
--- Peter Billson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas,
> My brother tells me that there has been some
> discussion about this on
> the kernel list. RedHat's patch was applied to
> 2.4.21 (plus
roblems. If you have stability problems anytime,
> you have faulty
> hardware. If you start running the limit of your
> hardware, the machine
> will let you know by dropping dns requests and being
> overall unresponsive.
>
> -jason
>
>
>
> peace bwitchu wrote:
plan to implement the split dns
topology. I don't have any statistics yet but plan to
have some by week end.
Peace
--- Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2003 03:08, peace bwitchu wrote:
> > this box working too hard or is the normal. Since
> > this box
I have recently installed bind 9.2.2 on 2 debian woody
sytems and have a couple of questions concerning the
cpu utilization. Bind is running on a 2.4 Ghrtz P4
and during a time period of 11:00 am -2:00pm the
average cpu util. is around 1o percent. during the
other hours of the day we are around 3
7 matches
Mail list logo
