Can anyone tell me if this is the correct way to increase the max number
of connections, or how to do it if it's not? I would try to test it
myself, but it is a bit hard to do on a busy server and when I would
need a huge number of connections.
Back in the olden-days (1999) on Solaris boxes, a comp
In the past I have used "exact"[0] to allow "pop-before-relay"
access, and it has worked well. I'm getting ready to move my mail
server and I was looking and it appears that "exact" is not
packaged for Debian
I've run "exact" with Debian/Exim -- and even contributed a little
code to support cu
In the past I have used "exact"[0] to allow "pop-before-relay"
access, and it has worked well. I'm getting ready to move my mail
server and I was looking and it appears that "exact" is not
packaged for Debian
I've run "exact" with Debian/Exim -- and even contributed a little
code to support cu
How can u blame him for some spammer emailing it using ur address
as a source?
He is the responsible party for mail originated from the pduck.com domain.
The minute his auto-responder fired off incorrectly, he became a spammer.
When he ignored requests to stop, he became a _willful_ spammer.
This
Could someone please help educate this person.
You mean the "From:" header could be forged?! Dear Lord NO! Russell,
say it ain't so!
I personally like giving forwarding pointers in the 550 text. People
can read it, but machines ignore it. (Though I hear Exchange
suppresses multi-line 550 text,
How can u blame him for some spammer emailing it using ur address
as a source?
He is the responsible party for mail originated from the pduck.com domain.
The minute his auto-responder fired off incorrectly, he became a spammer.
When he ignored requests to stop, he became a _willful_ spammer.
This
Could someone please help educate this person.
You mean the "From:" header could be forged?! Dear Lord NO! Russell,
say it ain't so!
I personally like giving forwarding pointers in the 550 text. People
can read it, but machines ignore it. (Though I hear Exchange
suppresses multi-line 550 text,
At 5:20 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian isn't the only linux distribution to have a base system. SLS had one.
Slackware had (still has?) one. MCC (if anyone can remember it) had one.
these are all dating back to 1993 or 1994, so it's not exactly a new
concept in the linux world.
Ah
At 5:20 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
debian isn't the only linux distribution to have a base system. SLS had one.
Slackware had (still has?) one. MCC (if anyone can remember it) had one.
these are all dating back to 1993 or 1994, so it's not exactly a new
concept in the linux world.
A
At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just
like *BSD, "base system" means that it
At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just
like *BSD, "base system" means that i
Hello Folks:
I call a local script from...
/etc/logrotate.d/apache
...in Debian 3.0 to run Analog reports. It is supposed to run once a
week, but it runs every day:
/var/log/apache/*.log {
weekly
missingok
rotate 52
compress
delaycompress
Pete:
In your alias file, as your last rule, put
*: username
Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because
with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would
qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run
any aliases generated by other rules in the fil
Pete:
>In your alias file, as your last rule, put
>
>*: username
>
Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because
with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would
qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run
any aliases generated by other rules i
At 6:30 PM -0600 2/20/02, Bernie Berg wrote:
im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to
spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail
box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
1. An alias file:
system_aliases:
driver = al
At 6:30 PM -0600 2/20/02, Bernie Berg wrote:
>im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to
>spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail
>box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
1. An alias file:
system_aliases:
driver
16 matches
Mail list logo
