-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kay-Michael Voit schrieb:
|
|
|>> If we work with iptables, we have to authenticate the client in some
|>> way. Though I think it is possible to extend iptables, this would
|>> exceed my abilitys a lot.
|>>
|>
|>
|> But maybe would be the cleanest / bes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kay-Michael Voit schrieb:
| Well, I'll consider Kourosh's suggestions at first.
| But, actually, I've some ideas how I could solve the problem for me and
| probably for some other, too.
|
| Mainly, my idea is limited through my programming skill, but i
> On Wired networks its not so easy to cheat the mac address, this number
> is set uniquely for each card in the world (or so my teacher said).
It's very easy to set the MAC Address on a linux box:
ifconfig eth0 hw ether 01:00:00:00:00:01
> Anyhow, its probably not all that hard either, but i t
> On Wired networks its not so easy to cheat the mac address, this number
> is set uniquely for each card in the world (or so my teacher said).
It's very easy to set the MAC Address on a linux box:
ifconfig eth0 hw ether 01:00:00:00:00:01
> Anyhow, its probably not all that hard either, but i t
Christoph Löffler schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone reach aljazeera.net or english.aljazeera.net from outside
of US? Or any nameservers for it?
I'm trying to determine if this is a US only issue, .
cfm
I dont reach them neither from Germany
same here con't resolv the hostname too
Chris
Christoph Löffler schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone reach aljazeera.net or english.aljazeera.net from outside
of US? Or any nameservers for it?
I'm trying to determine if this is a US only issue, .
cfm
I dont reach them neither from Germany
same here con't resolv the hostname too
C
Volker Tanger schrieb:
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
"Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemen
Burner schrieb:
[-snip-]
i guess iptables will do the trick with somthing like this:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth3 -s 192.168.1.135 -j SNAT --to 1.2.3.135
yup and ja can add a snat rule for the returning traffic too :-)
iproute2 looks way more flexible than iptables though, is this flexibi
Volker Tanger schrieb:
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
"Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemen
Randy Kramer schrieb:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
I'd almost expect a firewall per T1,
Burner schrieb:
[-snip-]
i guess iptables will do the trick with somthing like this:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth3 -s 192.168.1.135 -j SNAT --to 1.2.3.135
yup and ja can add a snat rule for the returning traffic too :-)
iproute2 looks way more flexible than iptables though, is this flexi
Randy Kramer schrieb:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
I'd almost expect a firewall per T
Russell Coker schrieb:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:20, echelon wrote:
>
>>I’m trying to get some new servers, but I’m not quiet sure that I’m
>>buying the right hardware.
>
>
> It appears from the web page that you are buying for price, this is
risky as
> there are many features of designed server ma
Hi List,
Zope and pygm2n stoped working on my sid box.
I get plenty of file not found messages from zope
as soon as I try to use the manage interface and
pygm2n issues the following errors:
deferral:
Could_not_find_platform_independent_libraries_/Could_not_find_platform_dependent_libraries_/Consid
Dave Smith wrote:
> I am using potato and have netstat v3.85. I have heard that you can list the
> masqueraded connection by using netstat -M, but when I do this, I am told
> that the kernel doens't support masqueraded connections. Do I need a newer
> version of netstat, or is there an alternativ
15 matches
Mail list logo
