On Thursday 25 March 2004 14:10, Brian May wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> netstat -rn output on the box (.7?) having issues.
>
> # netstat -rn | grep '^192\.168\.0'
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 eth0
> 192.
On Thursday 25 March 2004 14:10, Brian May wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> netstat -rn output on the box (.7?) having issues.
>
> # netstat -rn | grep '^192\.168\.0'
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U40 0 0 eth0
> 192.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:36 pm, Comcast Mail wrote:
> well... I am confused...I typed "Jesus help me live" & got a website..
> I only respond because I am a lost sheep..Do you understand?? ..c
Y'know, if you actually go to google and type in "jesus help me", the second
hit is this mai
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:36 pm, Comcast Mail wrote:
> well... I am confused...I typed "Jesus help me live" & got a website..
> I only respond because I am a lost sheep..Do you understand?? ..c
Y'know, if you actually go to google and type in "jesus help me", the second
hit is this mai
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
> accounts to move to a new server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no
> problem, but I do not want my clients to notice any problems with e-mail.
> They have IMAP availa
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:43, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Stupid Question: I have about 50 web sites and a few hundred e-mail
> accounts to move to a new server. New IP address, etc... Web sites are no
> problem, but I do not want my clients to notice any problems with e-mail.
> They have IMAP availa
On Friday 19 September 2003 14:04, Dan MacNeil wrote:
> We've a couple debian systems to patch for the new sshd problems.
>
> On one of them that is monitored closely and patched quickly. The other is
> patched less quickly.
>
> The system that is patched less quickly claims to be up to date but no
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 07:36 pm, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:24:35PM +0200, Sz?ts Róbert wrote:
> > Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall
> > where is more ppp connectoins? Expl.
> >
> > There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 00:45, Petrisor Eddy wrote:
> I am [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To clarify things,
> present configuration is:
>
> MyDebianStation - (proxy server/DHCP server=ISP's Proxy) - internet
>
> the IP's are given dynamically according to the MAC address of each PC in
> the network.
>
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 08:57 pm, Splash Tekalal wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Okay here's the setup I have..
>
> Right now there's a server sitting in a data center in California,
> Mephitsune.. Mephitsune is running STABLE and using BIND9 for DNS and has a
> static IP.. I have massive amounts of capable band
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 08:57 pm, Splash Tekalal wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Okay here's the setup I have..
>
> Right now there's a server sitting in a data center in California,
> Mephitsune.. Mephitsune is running STABLE and using BIND9 for DNS and has a
> static IP.. I have massive amounts of capable band
On Fri, 9 May 2003 03:16 pm, Simon Bland wrote:
> I'm having some trouble setting up a PPTP VPN server behind a firewall.
>
> Internet - Firewall LAN (Including PPTP server)
>
> At the moment I'm forwarding port 1723 back to the PPTP server. I can
> see the logs of the client connecting to
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:42 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
> MUAs that don't suck (or ones that just suck less[1]) have a
> "reply-to-list" feature so you can reply to whoever you want to
> regardless of what the stupid reply-to tag says.
Funny you should mention it, KMail actually does have this option, i
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:16 pm, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> And yet again I agree with Russel. Guess I don't say it that often..
> If I compare the amount of mails that contain a complaint (debian-isp,
> security etc) with the amount of spam (or mail sent blindly).. it's a tough
> call to make.
Well, Russ
On Fri, 2 May 2003 02:20 pm, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:00:18AM +1000, Tarragon Allen wrote:
>
> 8< snip >8
>
> > 2) could the goddamn reply address be set to go back to the LIST rather
> > than to the original sender? I don't know how many
On Fri, 2 May 2003 08:30 am, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> Hi!
> I would like to monitor a complex and heterogeneus network, but i dont
> know what to use for it. It should be almost real time monitor and has
> any kind of alerts (sound, sms..) Any idea? Thx
>
> Ghe Rivero
> --
Check out Netsaint (in
On Thu, 1 May 2003 10:44 am, Craig Sanders wrote:
> unless you want to use a routing daemon like zebra (which is overkill for
> this job), look at the man page for interfaces(5), the "up" command is
> probably what you want.
>
> e.g. something like this in /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> iface eth0 i
On Thu, 1 May 2003 10:05 pm, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> The translations: "help my online army grow, I am a little dwarf, so help
> me quick. click *on-url*. Join up with me and my army.".
>
> Cute :-) (but it's wrong).
[Spam/Whatever it was SNIPped]
Just wondering a couple of things about the manage
On Thu, 1 May 2003 02:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I get the following errors when compiling exim this seems to indecate a
> missing library.
>
> make[1]: *** [exim_dumpdb.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/home/installs/exim/exim-4.14/build-Linux-i386'
> make: *** [go] Error 2
>
> co
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:43 am, David Bishop wrote:
> I have a user that really like to create files. Then, they don't clean
> them up. We have already put a quota* on them, but unfortunetly, their
> directory is so large and convaluted, that they can't even figure out where
> all the disk space ha
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:04 am, Mark Constable wrote:
> Not strictly Debian related but the boxes in question are deb powered.
> I have just been given a /28 (16 node) subnet and until I get a switch
> in place I have a short xover eth cable between two boxes. I thought I
> could get away with a coup
21 matches
Mail list logo
