On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> > But, I could be wrong and not know about some switches. Haven't
> > really looked into it, I must admit.
> It shows with --verbose :)
> or in short form: ipchains -vL or -nvL
Learn minimally one new thing on one of the debian-*
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> > But, I could be wrong and not know about some switches. Haven't
> > really looked into it, I must admit.
> It shows with --verbose :)
> or in short form: ipchains -vL or -nvL
Learn minimally one new thing on one of the debian-*
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:57:06AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
[snip protocol stuff]
Thanks, informative.
> > This seems to be a broadcast by the DHCP server of my cable provider,
> > right?
> 67 == BOOTP server, 68 == BOOTP client.
> It appears to be a machine (10.209.80.109) broadcasting a
>
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > Sep 24 15:20:25 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 \
> > PROTO=17 10.209.80.109:68 255.255.255.255:67 \
> > L=576 S=0x00 I=9145 F=0x4000 T=32 (#11)
> >
> proto=17 -> look at /etc/protocols -> yes, udp
>
> > This
Hello
Is the following a tcp or a udp packet? How do I tell?
Sep 24 15:20:25 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 \
PROTO=17 10.209.80.109:68 255.255.255.255:67 \
L=576 S=0x00 I=9145 F=0x4000 T=32 (#11)
This seems to be a broadcast by the DHCP server of my cable provider,
ri
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
> try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> > What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> > effect)
I don't l
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
> try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> > What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> > effect)
I don't l
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
> try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> > What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> > effect)
I don't
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
> try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> > What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> > effect)
I don't
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:6
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:25:25AM -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> Finally, is there any place anyone is aware of that has the
> configuration used by the Debian kernel binary builders? In other
> words, the /usr/src/linux/.config from when they build the kernel?
Unless I misunderstand you, I th
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:25:25AM -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> Finally, is there any place anyone is aware of that has the
> configuration used by the Debian kernel binary builders? In other
> words, the /usr/src/linux/.config from when they build the kernel?
Unless I misunderstand you, I t
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> those kinds of things.
Are these things just malformed packets / frames sent to some machine
or
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> those kinds of things.
Are these things just malformed packets / frames sent to some machine
or
Hi all
Sorry for this being so highly off-topic, forgive me; I need the infos.
(It's just that debian lists are an excellent resort for information)
I'd like some infos from people who've had experience with this:
What web server software is in your opinion best for running on an NT
machine? (Ye
Hi all
Sorry for this being so highly off-topic, forgive me; I need the infos.
(It's just that debian lists are an excellent resort for information)
I'd like some infos from people who've had experience with this:
What web server software is in your opinion best for running on an NT
machine? (Y
17 matches
Mail list logo
