Re: CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-19 Thread Simon Allard
your setup with two nics as well? I would suggest the > problem is the NIC or the driver therefor. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > Simon Allard schrieb: > > > I have setup a linux box with a 2.4.19 kernel. I am bridging 2 ethernet > > devices together using 3Com

Re: CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-19 Thread Simon Allard
your setup with two nics as well? I would suggest the > problem is the NIC or the driver therefor. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > Simon Allard schrieb: > > > I have setup a linux box with a 2.4.19 kernel. I am bridging 2 ethernet > > devices together using 3Com

Re: CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Simon Allard
No. None what so ever. ipfiler/iptables modules are not even loaded Its a pretty clean running box. > Any firewall rules or logging mechanism? > > El mar, 18-11-2003 a las 15:12, Simon Allard escribió: > > I have setup a linux box with a 2.4.19 kernel. I am bridging 2 ether

Re: CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Simon Allard
No. None what so ever. ipfiler/iptables modules are not even loaded Its a pretty clean running box. > Any firewall rules or logging mechanism? > > El mar, 18-11-2003 a las 15:12, Simon Allard escribió: > > I have setup a linux box with a 2.4.19 kernel. I am bridging 2 ether

CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Simon Allard
delif br0 eth1 down brctl delif br0 eth2 post-down brctl delbr br0 Does anyone have any ideas off the top of your head what could be causing this or be able to point me in the right direction for some documentation relating to this problem. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey

CPU Utiliaztion on a ethernet bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Simon Allard
delif br0 eth1 down brctl delif br0 eth2 post-down brctl delbr br0 Does anyone have any ideas off the top of your head what could be causing this or be able to point me in the right direction for some documentation relating to this problem. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey

Slurpd.status file and S1T

2001-09-09 Thread Simon Allard
file becomes more than 1 hour old. root@ihug:/raid-1/ldap/slurpd/replica# cat slurpd.status loch:0:99957:1 circle:0:99957:1 triangle:0:99957:1 bob:0:99957:1 kate:0:99957:1 I am running openldap 2.0.13. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey) IHUG Ph (09) 358-5067 Email: [

./debian directorys in packages

2001-08-09 Thread Simon Allard
Simon Allard Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey) IHUG Ph (09) 358-5067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Virtual Hosting

2001-07-26 Thread Simon Allard
that took "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as the actual username, rather than just > "user" ? > > Would that be possible? Not with the current c0de base. Possible to do with code changes though. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey) IHUG Ph (09) 358-5067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] &quo

Re: Virtual Hosting

2001-07-25 Thread Simon Allard
use Port-Based Virtual Hosting, > because mostly everyone expected Port 21 for FTP. > > Thanks for any hints. > > -- > bye > > Waldemar > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: UFS

2001-05-10 Thread Simon Allard
> mount -w -t ufs -o ufstype=sun /dev/sda1 /mnt/scsi I would imagine mount -w -t ufs -o ufstype=sun,rw /dev/sda1 /mnt/scsi The mount man page says by default UFS is mounted Read-only. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey) IHUG Ph (09) 358-5067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The real fighting

Re: UFS

2001-05-10 Thread Simon Allard
> mount -w -t ufs -o ufstype=sun /dev/sda1 /mnt/scsi I would imagine mount -w -t ufs -o ufstype=sun,rw /dev/sda1 /mnt/scsi The mount man page says by default UFS is mounted Read-only. Simon Allard (Senior Tool Monkey) IHUG Ph (09) 358-5067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The real fighting