Re: 2.6 kernel network interface assignment order

2004-01-29 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:53:57PM -0600, Rich Puhek wrote: > If it's really critical, or happens often, perhaps you'll want to write > a custom init script that looks at the hardware address of the > interface, and configures the appropriate IP settings for the interface. > > Something like the

Re: 2.6 kernel network interface assignment order

2004-01-29 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:53:57PM -0600, Rich Puhek wrote: > If it's really critical, or happens often, perhaps you'll want to write > a custom init script that looks at the hardware address of the > interface, and configures the appropriate IP settings for the interface. > > Something like the

Re: turn a firewall into a wireless access point?

2003-11-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:16:10AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote: > I was curious if there was software to turn my firewall into a wireless > access point? I've got a shorewall setup that has "net", "loc", and "dmz" > zones. My plan was to make a "dmzw" zone for the wireless. I've got an > Orinoco

Re: turn a firewall into a wireless access point?

2003-11-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:16:10AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote: > I was curious if there was software to turn my firewall into a wireless > access point? I've got a shorewall setup that has "net", "loc", and "dmz" > zones. My plan was to make a "dmzw" zone for the wireless. I've got an > Orinoco

Re: ip aliasing and second default gw in /etc/network/interfaces

2003-09-03 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:23:58AM -0700, Peter Nome wrote: *snip* > My situation is that I have two subnets, each of which have their own DSL gateway, > and I'd > like the subnet machines (selectively) to be able to talk to each other and to have > the other > DSL router as a fallback when it

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:42:36PM +, Martin Wheeler wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out whether I'm better off putting > > on testing or unstable > > >From what you say, it sounds as if only unstable is going to give you the > latest ver

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:30:39PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > > To: Martin Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "John R. Ackermann N8UR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I j

Re: OT: testing vs. unstable for new laptop installation

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:16:10PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > To: Martin Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "John R. Ackermann N8UR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just wanted to apologize for this, I am well aware of the policy on this mailing list. I h

Re: Process -:0

2003-08-14 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:52:40AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was just doing some debugging on another problem and did a ps -eaf and > saw the following line that looks very suspicious to me: > > UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD > root 319 315 0 09:55

Re: R: linux pci PRI cards

2003-08-09 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:54:31PM +0200, Sebastiano Scorbati wrote: > http://www.cuyclades.com I think this poster meant http://www.cyclades.com :) - Keegan pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:05:12PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > > I dont have module support and I dont have /proc/kmem. Am I missing > > something ? Running 2.4.20. > > /dev/kmem? You can remove it, sur

Re: Automatic DNS for dynamic clients?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:57:54AM -0400, Splash Tekalal wrote: > My question is, is there something I can setup between the two machines > that will have Horde automatically report it's IP to Mephitsune on a > schedule, then Mephitsune update the zone file and reload DNS? > > Any suggestions on

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:05:12PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > > I dont have module support and I dont have /proc/kmem. Am I missing > > something ? Running 2.4.20. > > /dev/kmem? You can remove it, sur

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 22:30, Mario Lopez wrote: > > In any case if you have a lkm rootkit, your done, dosent matter if > > you upload static, dinamic or whatever, kernel root kits are hard to > > find, not even lsmod, rmmod can help

Re: Automatic DNS for dynamic clients?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:57:54AM -0400, Splash Tekalal wrote: > My question is, is there something I can setup between the two machines > that will have Horde automatically report it's IP to Mephitsune on a > schedule, then Mephitsune update the zone file and reload DNS? > > Any suggestions on

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-07-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Shri Shrikumar wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 22:30, Mario Lopez wrote: > > In any case if you have a lkm rootkit, your done, dosent matter if > > you upload static, dinamic or whatever, kernel root kits are hard to > > find, not even lsmod, rmmod can help

Re: review host based intrusion detection sytems

2003-06-23 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Saturday 21 June 2003 10:24 am, Dan MacNeil wrote: > Doing an apt-cache search on "tripwire" and "intrusion" > > I came up with these packages: > > aide > bsign > fcheck > integrit > > I've googled around a bit but haven't found much evaluation... > > Does anyone have opi

Re: review host based intrusion detection sytems

2003-06-23 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Saturday 21 June 2003 10:24 am, Dan MacNeil wrote: > Doing an apt-cache search on "tripwire" and "intrusion" > > I came up with these packages: > > aide > bsign > fcheck > integrit > > I've googled around a bit but haven't found much evaluation... > > Does anyone have opi

Re: Visitor based netoworking

2003-06-11 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:53 am, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > I took a look at nocat and it really seems to do almost the things > I'm looking for *g* Thank you. > > But I have a recommendation / question: Wouldn't it be possible to > also check the MAC of clients on the net? This way we could make

Re: Visitor based netoworking

2003-06-11 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:53 am, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > I took a look at nocat and it really seems to do almost the things > I'm looking for *g* Thank you. > > But I have a recommendation / question: Wouldn't it be possible to > also check the MAC of clients on the net? This way we could make

Re: Visitor based netoworking

2003-06-10 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 10:53 am, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > But what if you need an "open" system? Not loggin into domain but > loggin in via webinterface? E.g. when they try to surf the net they > get redirected to "authenticate here first". I think what you're looking for is implemented in a syst

Re: Visitor based netoworking

2003-06-10 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 10:53 am, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > But what if you need an "open" system? Not loggin into domain but > loggin in via webinterface? E.g. when they try to surf the net they > get redirected to "authenticate here first". I think what you're looking for is implemented in a syst

Re: port blocking

2003-04-07 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Saturday 05 April 2003 01:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm trying to lock down my server, which, for historical reasons *has* > to run the various nis services. No problem, I'll just block the ports > that ypfrx, yppasswdd, ypbind, etc bind to. However, it seems that they > choose a diffe

Re: How to avoid the screen timeout when no activity

2003-01-15 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 06:57 am, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote: > On za, 2003-01-11 at 14:05, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Am 18:02 2003-01-07 -0800 hat Jeremy C. Reed geschrieben: > > >On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Samantha Scafe wrote: > > >> How can avoid the timeout of the monitor. > > > > > >Look at sett

Re: cybercafe management software - me too ;-))

2002-12-18 Thread Keegan Quinn
Hello Michelle, On Tuesday 17 December 2002 05:39 pm, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Now my question:There is a tool (I do not know the name) which can > count the login-time of users... > How can I use it, to bill my Clients ? I think this is what you are