Hello!
El mié, 30-10-2002 a las 15:59, C. R. Oldham escribió:
...
> It is possible, in hotels that have broadband in rooms, and on some
> university campuses I've been too they have a DHCP server setup to serve
> addresses from a private block. On that network there is a webserver
...
>
> Sorry,
Hello!
I remember, that sendmail, exim, and others have queuing strategies,
that try to minimize the number of remote conections.
El lun, 25-11-2002 a las 07:00, Craig Sanders escribió:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:37:58PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > nope, because postfix has no way of knowing
Hello!
El mar, 19-11-2002 a las 17:07, jernej horvat escribió:
...
> I have a question about djbdns - can i have one control file for all
> IP's/interfaces that i have on one system ?
...
You can configure env/IP to 0.0.0.0 so it will listen on _all_
interfaces.
Best Regards,
Jorge-Le
Hello!
Wow, man! this thread is already quite worn out. I love to read Craig
Sanders for some three mails about some topic, but then it get's boring,
Is there a tarpitting filter for Evolution somewhere?
El mar, 19-11-2002 a las 16:17, jernej horvat escribió:
...
>
> If only djb's sw would be
Hello!
El lun, 16-09-2002 a las 13:58, Thedore Knab escribió:
> I was wondering if anyone is using shaper.deb to manage bandwidth.
I am using it on the National University of Engineering at the Border
Firewall.
The kernel used is 2.4.7 or 2.4.18 as far as I remember (from 100km
distance).
Until
Hello!
El lun, 16-09-2002 a las 13:58, Thedore Knab escribió:
> I was wondering if anyone is using shaper.deb to manage bandwidth.
I am using it on the National University of Engineering at the Border
Firewall.
The kernel used is 2.4.7 or 2.4.18 as far as I remember (from 100km
distance).
Unti
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:05:03PM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
> For some reason, procmail seems to be sporadically losing messages into thin
> air. Only a few messages are being lost, but they are important messages (as
...
Not that this has necessarily to do with it, but safecat's author
cl
Hello!
It was a very interesting discussion about Mail Storage efficiency and
finally made me look into ext3 and reiser - very cool.
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Loren Jordan wrote:
...
> problems. This pine package also supports maildirs. The stock build of
> Pine does NOT, last t
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:06:07AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
...
> There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
...
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 09:26:29AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
...
> No. I use maildirs on my IMAP server and mboxes on my desktop because they
> are appropriate to each.
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:32:01PM +0200, Jones Down wrote:
...
> My alternative is to use ssh, there is a really beatiful win-prog to
> use scp, looks like mc, can be found here:
>
> http://winscp.vse.cz/eng/
>
> but then again you should setup a chroot environment, because it´s
>
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:15:53PM +0200, Riccardo Losselli wrote:
...
> I know it will never be like bgp, but it still better than nothing at
> all, or not?
I don't know bgp at all, but I cannot believe it's easier than the
following:
One Linux Router, three network cards:
1- nothing s
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:08:14PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
...
> > My understanding was that the Maildir patches for the c-client libraries
> > (affecting the UW imapd and Pine) were not very stable. Furthermore, as
People using non-Maildir functional Software wouldn't need to migrat
Hello!
I just want to sense the environment about a to be proposed Debian
policy change with respect to mail handling.
Maildir delivery has lots of advantages over mbox spools, but the
latter is the only standard.
Almost all M*A's support both standards.
It would be a big relieve, if one could
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:48:57PM -0700, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote:
...
> What are your problems with qmail? What do you like about the
> Postfix comm. that QMail lacks? Not trolling for flamewars
...
My personal experiences:
Sendmail - cryptic macro language
Exim - delightfull rel
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:40:23PM -0400, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
...
> I am brand new to openldap though. I set up ispman, and can use it to
> add domains and such, but I am not sure how to add ldap to the pam
> files so that it checks for local accounts, and if none, it then checks
> ld
Hello!
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:33:37AM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
[...]
> Alot of people will resist this if it means replacing every mail server
> on the Internet, or even just the mail software on every Internet mail
> server. This has to be a revision compatible with the existing SMTP
> proto
Hello!
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:34:09AM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote:
> Hi again
>
> Really the comparison between rbl lists is academic. It is good that
> there are many different and evolving systems to block spam accordingly
> with different success rates.
>
> However from a 'email service
Hello!
while not having much experience on this I'd like to comment.
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:39:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
>
> Is the load from all those rblsmtpd process bigger than accepting the
> email | procmail | spamassassin? I've no idea how many times
> the typical spa
Hello!
I know that this does not directly answer your BIND9 Question!
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:27:24AM -0300, Auro Florentino wrote:
...
> My priority is to cut off the shell access to non-administrators (like support
>people) to modify or delete zone or records on BIND9, and to integrate our
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Tommy van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What kind of tools are you using for network cabling and patches
> management? We've tried txtfiles, acessdatabases and such but we're
IRM is quite of alpha, but it should be simple to expand it.
It uses a mysq
Hello!
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:09:20AM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building a set of scripts to archive email messages in a custom way.
>
> Do you know of any better shell tools for extracting from, cc, subject etc.
> >from the headers than procmail/formail?
look at http://cr.
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:51:30PM -0600, José A. Guzmán wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:46:49AM -0600, Georg Lehner wrote:
>
> > as I found they harmed
> > use of ldap in nsswitch and samba-ldap autentication (but I may be
> > wrong).
>
> How come?
>
> I've used them to migrate
Hello!
I know that there has been some discussion on the list about this, but
I could not find it:
What minimum characteristics would a Linux IP Masquerading Firewall
Box need, to run a 100 Mbps link without slowing down traffic.
What is the maximum bandwidth you can get with a Linux based
Gatew
Hello!
I know that there has been some discussion on the list about this, but
I could not find it:
What minimum characteristics would a Linux IP Masquerading Firewall
Box need, to run a 100 Mbps link without slowing down traffic.
What is the maximum bandwidth you can get with a Linux based
Gate
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:24:27PM -0500, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
...
> very good idea, but I was wonering if anyone one the list has every made
> a custom boot cd, with specific packages and a custom kernel
> image/modules (xfs support, etc.)
...
I have seen various on the debian-cd list
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:31:24PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> and run a script to
> copy hda to hdc
> lilo hdc so that it will boot as hda
Can you tell us the lilo parameters/configuration. Did this once in a
hurry, but when I swapped hdc to hda it did not work
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:31:24PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> and run a script to
> copy hda to hdc
> lilo hdc so that it will boot as hda
Can you tell us the lilo parameters/configuration. Did this once in a
hurry, but when I swapped hdc to hda it did not work
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:24:27PM -0500, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
...
> very good idea, but I was wonering if anyone one the list has every made
> a custom boot cd, with specific packages and a custom kernel
> image/modules (xfs support, etc.)
...
I have seen various on the debian-cd lis
Hello!
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 01:53:15AM +0100, Paul Fleischer wrote:
...
> I have searched around, but could not find anything related with direct
> LDAP authentication, only SASL which too me looks like introducing an
> unnecesarry component.
Sasl is yet needed for Mutt. You do *not* use Mutt?
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 04:55:44AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
...
> I know that as a company, we could donate a bit of money (with the economy
> as it is, not much though), but from what I can see, money isn't really
> where the problem lies... it is somewhere else.
...
Last Debian Weekly New
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 06:39:46AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
...
> aspect of their distro pretty good. They are business people over there,
> and they know how frequent business users like to have updates, and when
...
People here around *only* know RedHat, and it's *the best*, because
each
Hello!
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 01:53:15AM +0100, Paul Fleischer wrote:
...
> I have searched around, but could not find anything related with direct
> LDAP authentication, only SASL which too me looks like introducing an
> unnecesarry component.
Sasl is yet needed for Mutt. You do *not* use Mutt
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 04:55:44AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
...
> I know that as a company, we could donate a bit of money (with the economy
> as it is, not much though), but from what I can see, money isn't really
> where the problem lies... it is somewhere else.
...
Last Debian Weekly Ne
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 06:39:46AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
...
> aspect of their distro pretty good. They are business people over there,
> and they know how frequent business users like to have updates, and when
...
People here around *only* know RedHat, and it's *the best*, because
each
Hello!
We install/reconfigure re-install almost on a daily basis via a local
network, which is far the fastest way, better than any CD.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:09:54PM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
> Hello Oliver
>
...
> We use this installation procedure. It is not really "mass" but can
> gener
Hello!
We install/reconfigure re-install almost on a daily basis via a local
network, which is far the fastest way, better than any CD.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:09:54PM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
> Hello Oliver
>
...
> We use this installation procedure. It is not really "mass" but can
> gene
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:55:08PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
...
> Now I'd like to make my Debian GNU/Linux login and authenticate from the
> LDAP server, where should I begin?
...
Sorry, I forgot another issue with libpam-ldap:
There is an anonymous user, and if you do not authenticat
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 03:55:08PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
...
> Now I'd like to make my Debian GNU/Linux login and authenticate from the
> LDAP server, where should I begin?
...
I have played around with ldap and pam since mid of December, and
found that there are some issues with d
Hello!
It was already sort of pointed out by other people, that your
situation can probably handlead easier by dividing it in to tasks:
- fast recovery from data damage
- prevention of changes made by hackers/virus
each of which can be better handled by individual aproaches.
While the former h
Hello!
It was already sort of pointed out by other people, that your
situation can probably handlead easier by dividing it in to tasks:
- fast recovery from data damage
- prevention of changes made by hackers/virus
each of which can be better handled by individual aproaches.
While the former
Hello!
We bought a Clone with a 950k, AMD-Duron Processor, Motherboard by
Biostar to build an Intranet Server out of it.
When installing a new Kernel (2.4.7), compiled for this processortype
the machine stopped to work, because of severe Memory fault problems,
reducing the access "speed" from 13
Hello!
We bought a Clone with a 950k, AMD-Duron Processor, Motherboard by
Biostar to build an Intranet Server out of it.
When installing a new Kernel (2.4.7), compiled for this processortype
the machine stopped to work, because of severe Memory fault problems,
reducing the access "speed" from 133
Hello!
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:02:10AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
...
> you should be able to do that in your apache configuration - either deny
> access to unencrypted connections or send a redirect to the encrypted
> URL.
...
Eric Jennings yet sent kindly the recipe :) And I rushed to imple
Hello!
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:02:10AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
...
> you should be able to do that in your apache configuration - either deny
> access to unencrypted connections or send a redirect to the encrypted
> URL.
...
Eric Jennings yet sent kindly the recipe :) And I rushed to impl
Hello!
I'm using mailman, but only at a *very* small scale.
While beeing satisfied about the ease of configuration and managment
of the lists, I am worried about the fact, that the list administrator
is sending the list password in cleartext over the net when logging in.
Of course I give the adm
Hello!
I'm using mailman, but only at a *very* small scale.
While beeing satisfied about the ease of configuration and managment
of the lists, I am worried about the fact, that the list administrator
is sending the list password in cleartext over the net when logging in.
Of course I give the ad
46 matches
Mail list logo
