also
provides a nice way of configuring QoS parameters. Worth a try. :-)
--
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Flow Communications Pty. Ltd.
also
provides a nice way of configuring QoS parameters. Worth a try. :-)
--
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Flow Communications Pty. Ltd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:28, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> Is it bad practise to use X on your Debian ISP/Hosting machines ?
> Here I have 4 boxes all without X. I've always been of the impression
> X on servers was not good.
It's not a terrible thing to do, unless you forget to correctly firewall
your
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 09:27, Brad Lay wrote:
> Anybody know of a backport of request-tracker2 from testing/unstable? even
> rt3 would do, so long as it'll work in Woody.
It's a very simple, uncomplicated backport. You could do it very easily
yourself. rt3 is significantly more difficult, however.
> ==
> In file included from auth_ldap.c:20:
> auth_ldap.h:33: ldap.h: No such file or directory
> auth_ldap.h:34: lber.h: No such file or directory
> auth_ldap.h:53: ldap_ssl.h: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [auth_ldap.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/source/
> I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security
> upgrade package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by
> one, making sure they are in safe status.
>
> I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
> servers in this case? Any tool or
> I have some debian servers and hav a pain when these is security
> upgrade package available, for I have to check and upgrade them one by
> one, making sure they are in safe status.
>
> I wonder how the administrator manage dozens or even hundreds of debian
> servers in this case? Any tool or
> Jeff,
> please share the cons/pros with us
The following document provides a good analysis of why Maildir was more
appropriate to Courier IMAP's general audience and tasks (the SELECT.1
benchmarks are telling):
http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/
To me, the differences can be
> > There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
>
> Aren't they mostly to do with backwards compatibility? If everything in
> Debian could handle it, wouldn't this be a non-issue?
No. I use maildirs on my IMAP server and mboxes on my desktop because they
are appropriate to each. They o
> Failing that, a migration to pure maildir would probably be good, provided
> the migration could be handled transperantly.
There are plenty of reasons to not use Maildir, too.
- Jeff
--
"What's up with that word though... it's like something you did to
frogs in grammar s
> Do you know of any better shell tools for extracting from, cc, subject etc.
> from the headers than procmail/formail?
How about Python and its RFC822 modules?
- Jeff
--
"But in the software world, that's daily business." - Kent Beck
"That's pissing money away and leaving
> Mar 24 22:29:08 lyta postfix/master[21216]: warning: process
>/usr/lib/postfix/cleanup pid 21253 killed by signal 6
> Mar 24 22:29:08 lyta postfix/master[21216]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/cleanup: bad
>command startup -- throttling
>
> Any suggestions?
Sounds like what happens if master.cf
> Russel, would you recommend software RAID with a production system? Have
> you tried it? Curious.
I would, and have.
- Jeff
--
He's not an idiot.
The doctor said so.
--
T
> I'd like to do antiviral filtering but budget is low. Any
> recommendations?
postfix + amavis + nod32 (www.nod32.com). Happens to be the best, too.
- Jeff
--
There's no horse higher, no mailing list taunt lower, no developer base
wider. Rock My Software in the Bosom o
> anyway, this is wicked, and i immediately want to give a virtual machine
> to every single one of my users.
Nice idea, but it's not going to work. Perhaps with some real love and
affection from someone who purely wanted to achieve this (and wasn't
primarily interested in using it as a debuggin
> anyway, this is wicked, and i immediately want to give a virtual machine
> to every single one of my users.
Nice idea, but it's not going to work. Perhaps with some real love and
affection from someone who purely wanted to achieve this (and wasn't
primarily interested in using it as a debuggi
> > 3) Add this to authorized_keys for the above account, specifying the
> > command that logins with this key are allowed to run. See command="" in
> > sshd(1).
>
> I can't find the document about this section, can you show me
> some reference or examples? Many thanks.
man sshd, down the botto
> > 3) Add this to authorized_keys for the above account, specifying the
> > command that logins with this key are allowed to run. See command="" in
> > sshd(1).
>
> I can't find the document about this section, can you show me
> some reference or examples? Many thanks.
man sshd, down the bott
> I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
> to have long email addresses, like .@domain.com ,
> and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars.
This is a sensible request...
> What is the best email server to do this kind of mapping?
But this is just emot
> I have a customer who wants to host his own email server, and he wants
> to have long email addresses, like .@domain.com ,
> and map it to a local name that is less than 8 chars.
This is a sensible request...
> What is the best email server to do this kind of mapping?
But this is just emo
> OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among servers
> to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt, then the
> cracker will not need to send any password as well as passphrase when ssh
> login onto another server, right?
No, password and rsa/dsa authenti
> OK. My problem is, if I use rsync+ssh with blank passphrase among servers
> to automate rsync+ssh backup procedure without password prompt, then the
> cracker will not need to send any password as well as passphrase when ssh
> login onto another server, right?
No, password and rsa/dsa authent
> I am sorry I could be kind of off-topic. But I want to know how to
> cross-site rsync without authentication, say ssh auth.,?
That's the best way.
> I've read some doc. using ssh-keygen to generate key pairs, appending the
> public keys to ~/.ssh/authorized_hosts on another host to prevent ss
> I am sorry I could be kind of off-topic. But I want to know how to
> cross-site rsync without authentication, say ssh auth.,?
That's the best way.
> I've read some doc. using ssh-keygen to generate key pairs, appending the
> public keys to ~/.ssh/authorized_hosts on another host to prevent s
> Sigh... and I was hoping for a simple solution like cp /mnt/disk1/*
> /mnt/disk2/ :-/
This is the point at which we have one of those "Brady Bunch Moments", when
everyone stands around chuckling at what they've learned, and the credits
roll.
- Jeff
--
"And that's what it sounds like if
> Sigh... and I was hoping for a simple solution like cp /mnt/disk1/*
> /mnt/disk2/ :-/
This is the point at which we have one of those "Brady Bunch Moments", when
everyone stands around chuckling at what they've learned, and the credits
roll.
- Jeff
--
"And that's what it sounds like i
> > It's called RAID-1.
>
> I dunno... whenever I think of "RAID" I always think of live mirrors that
> operate constantly
That's what they do post-sync.
> and not a "once in a while" mirror operation just to
> perform a backup (when talking about RAID-1). Am I mistaken in this
> thinking?
Th
> Except that I've pointed out already that we're specifically NOT looking
> at a live RAID solution. This is a backup drive that is suppose to be
> synced every 12 hours or 24 hours.
Sorry, but I don't see any benefit to having maximum 12 hour old data when
you could have 0. The hardware soluti
> For example, http://www.arcoide.com/ . To quote the function we're looking
> at " the DupliDisk2 automatically switches to the remaining drive and
> alerts the user that a drive has failed. Then, depending on the model, the
> user can hot-swap out the failed drive and re-mirror in the backgroun
> > It's called RAID-1.
>
> I dunno... whenever I think of "RAID" I always think of live mirrors that
> operate constantly
That's what they do post-sync.
> and not a "once in a while" mirror operation just to
> perform a backup (when talking about RAID-1). Am I mistaken in this
> thinking?
T
> Except that I've pointed out already that we're specifically NOT looking
> at a live RAID solution. This is a backup drive that is suppose to be
> synced every 12 hours or 24 hours.
Sorry, but I don't see any benefit to having maximum 12 hour old data when
you could have 0. The hardware solut
> Never mind, the LVM HOWTO is making sense. Must be this hour of the morning,
> or the hangover or...
I hope there are more hackers working on LVM than just Sistina. Another GFS
snatcheroo would suck. [ Go to www.opengfs.org for the Free GFS. :) ]
- Jeff
--
"Can we have a special TELSABUG
> Any pointers appreciated.
Never mind, the LVM HOWTO is making sense. Must be this hour of the morning,
or the hangover or...
- Jeff
--
http://www.xach.com/debian-users-are-beatniks.html
> LVM. Create a snapshot of the LV and then use dd to copy it.
>
> LVM solves this, but adds it's own set of problems.
Russell, do you know of a good (reasonably practical *and* theoretical)
intro to LVM? It's just seemed overly complicated when I've looked at it in
the past.
Any pointers app
> For example, http://www.arcoide.com/ . To quote the function we're looking
> at " the DupliDisk2 automatically switches to the remaining drive and
> alerts the user that a drive has failed. Then, depending on the model, the
> user can hot-swap out the failed drive and re-mirror in the backgrou
> I've just done some tests on that with 33G partitions of 46G IDE drives.
> The drives are on different IDE buses, and the CPU is an Athlon 800.
>
> So it seems to me that page size is probably a good buffer size to use.
Cool! Nothing like Real Proper Testing to prove a point. ;)
I'm surprise
> Never mind, the LVM HOWTO is making sense. Must be this hour of the morning,
> or the hangover or...
I hope there are more hackers working on LVM than just Sistina. Another GFS
snatcheroo would suck. [ Go to www.opengfs.org for the Free GFS. :) ]
- Jeff
--
"Can we have a special TELSABU
> Any pointers appreciated.
Never mind, the LVM HOWTO is making sense. Must be this hour of the morning,
or the hangover or...
- Jeff
--
http://www.xach.com/debian-users-are-beatniks.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
> LVM. Create a snapshot of the LV and then use dd to copy it.
>
> LVM solves this, but adds it's own set of problems.
Russell, do you know of a good (reasonably practical *and* theoretical)
intro to LVM? It's just seemed overly complicated when I've looked at it in
the past.
Any pointers ap
> I've just done some tests on that with 33G partitions of 46G IDE drives.
> The drives are on different IDE buses, and the CPU is an Athlon 800.
>
> So it seems to me that page size is probably a good buffer size to use.
Cool! Nothing like Real Proper Testing to prove a point. ;)
I'm surpris
> What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
> (similar sized) HD?
dd, using a large buffer size for reasonable performance
- Jeff
--
"Linux continues to have almost as much soul as James Brown." - Forrest
Cook, LWN
> What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
> (similar sized) HD?
dd, using a large buffer size for reasonable performance
- Jeff
--
"Linux continues to have almost as much soul as James Brown." - Forrest
Cook, LWN
> > Why don't you just update your robots.txt to explicitly specify which
> > files you don't or do, allow spiders access to. If it's a rule-obiding
> > spider, that will be the end of it.
>
> I wasn't aware that there was any format to robots.txt, I thought that the
> mere presense of such a f
> > Why don't you just update your robots.txt to explicitly specify which
> > files you don't or do, allow spiders access to. If it's a rule-obiding
> > spider, that will be the end of it.
>
> I wasn't aware that there was any format to robots.txt, I thought that the
> mere presense of such a
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth-Type := Crypt-Local, Password == "6IVIw"
> > garry Auth-Type := Crypt-Local, Password == "6IVIw"
>
> I haven't tried FreeRADIUS, so I may be talking nonsense, but
> that password does not look crypted. It should look something
> like this: X.SldLTDxGIGU or ab
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth-Type := Crypt-Local, Password == "6IVIw"
> > garry Auth-Type := Crypt-Local, Password == "6IVIw"
>
> I haven't tried FreeRADIUS, so I may be talking nonsense, but
> that password does not look crypted. It should look something
> like this: X.SldLTDxGIGU or a
Hi all,
Having some troubles with freeradius as packaged in woody. I'm doing a very
quick auth migration for a PM3, taking usernames and crypted passwords from
an old Qube, and putting them ni various files for service authentication.
FreeRADIUS is not cooperating. ;)
Here's an example of what I
Hi all,
Having some troubles with freeradius as packaged in woody. I'm doing a very
quick auth migration for a PM3, taking usernames and crypted passwords from
an old Qube, and putting them ni various files for service authentication.
FreeRADIUS is not cooperating. ;)
Here's an example of what
> They have various kinds of reasons. Some are reasonable, some not.
> If they just insisit on mbox format and ask for imap service with mbox
> support. Is there any compatible method to take?
What are the reasons?
It's not a worthwhile thing to change if it's not entirely necessary. You
have a
> They have various kinds of reasons. Some are reasonable, some not.
> If they just insisit on mbox format and ask for imap service with mbox
> support. Is there any compatible method to take?
What are the reasons?
It's not a worthwhile thing to change if it's not entirely necessary. You
have
> Warning: LDAP: Unable to bind to server: Invalid DN syntax in
> /usr/lib/sourceforge/www/include/ldap.php on line 50
>
> * The distinguished name of the search base: dc=dev.uprint.web
Should be:
dc=dev,dc=uprint,dc=web
- Jeff
--
We're passe with class, eh?
> Warning: LDAP: Unable to bind to server: Invalid DN syntax in
> /usr/lib/sourceforge/www/include/ldap.php on line 50
>
> * The distinguished name of the search base: dc=dev.uprint.web
Should be:
dc=dev,dc=uprint,dc=web
- Jeff
--
We're passe with class, eh?
> Does anyone have the slightest clue how to host mail for multiple domains
> such that every domain has a unique namespace? Thinking about the matter,
> I realized I don't quite know how to accomplish this.
Postfix virtual domains operate like this by default, however you can make
it operate li
> Does anyone have the slightest clue how to host mail for multiple domains
> such that every domain has a unique namespace? Thinking about the matter,
> I realized I don't quite know how to accomplish this.
Postfix virtual domains operate like this by default, however you can make
it operate l
> Anyway, thats our take on it... and its never failed us so far. Takes
> quite a bit of effort though... so watch out.
Just to chime in, we use stable only, with quite a few backports. [1] Often
enough there's a package I'd really like - right now it's a fresh postfix -
but I find greater stabi
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> > number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> > topology allows for the performance requirements.
&
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
number of differen
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> > number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> > topology allows for the performance requirements.
&
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
number of differe
> Are there many xfs users our there? Is the development active?
> If not is it because the xfs is stable, or has the xfs initiative
> lost momentum?
My home machine:
:r! mount | grep hd
/dev/hda2 on / type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/hdc2 on /var type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/hdc3 on /h
> Look in the the debian dir of the src deb. The rules, post*, pre*, and
> apacheconfig files are all hardcoded to assuming the Debian Layout.
You haven't mentioned what's wrong, or requires customisation...
> That's all fine and good, but it restricts customization. I'm not sure
> how foobar
> Has anyone managed to customize (as in "use your own Layout on") an
> apache build from .deb source? I can't stand the debian Layout and want
> to customize it (or even use an existing layout that comes with apache).
> The problem is that all of the build scripts and whatnot assume you use
> t
> I'm going to be setting up a mail server (Exim + uwimapd + IMP webmail)
> that will serve about 300-500 users.
>
> There will not be a major amount of traffic being put through it and was
> wondering if anyone had any cost effective hardware recommendations for
> CPU/RAM/HD space?
You can r
> There's a number of guides that tell you about hdparm and what DMA is, but if
> you already know that stuff then there's little good documentation.
"Oh bum." :)
> Then on the rare occasions that I do meet people who know this stuff
> reasonably well they seem to spend all their time trying
> I'm going to be setting up a mail server (Exim + uwimapd + IMP webmail)
> that will serve about 300-500 users.
>
> There will not be a major amount of traffic being put through it and was
> wondering if anyone had any cost effective hardware recommendations for
> CPU/RAM/HD space?
You can
> There's a number of guides that tell you about hdparm and what DMA is, but if
> you already know that stuff then there's little good documentation.
"Oh bum." :)
> Then on the rare occasions that I do meet people who know this stuff
> reasonably well they seem to spend all their time trying
> RAID-5 is another issue though. But then you have to consider that Linux
> software RAID kills the performance of most hardware RAID controllers. Run
> an Athlon 800 with two IDE drives in RAID-1 and expect 2-4 times the
> performance for bulk IO that an entry level Mylex RAID controller w
> RAID-5 is another issue though. But then you have to consider that Linux
> software RAID kills the performance of most hardware RAID controllers. Run
> an Athlon 800 with two IDE drives in RAID-1 and expect 2-4 times the
> performance for bulk IO that an entry level Mylex RAID controller
> There is a Company at
> http://www.bynari.net/Products/TradeServer/trade_server.html that has
> info on using Outlook with Linux. I have never used it but it looks
> interesting.
Bynari are (trying to avoid libel suits and things like that)... very silly.
- Jeff
--
> There is a Company at
> http://www.bynari.net/Products/TradeServer/trade_server.html that has
> info on using Outlook with Linux. I have never used it but it looks
> interesting.
Bynari are (trying to avoid libel suits and things like that)... very silly.
- Jeff
--
> I am looking for a Linux based tool that is designed to help manage a
> variety of projects. This tool needs to be able to schedule and track
> tasks
MrProject from CodeFactory (codefactory.se) is kicking arse at the moment;
perhaps you could pitch in and help out?
> and interface with Outloo
> I am looking for a Linux based tool that is designed to help manage a
> variety of projects. This tool needs to be able to schedule and track
> tasks
MrProject from CodeFactory (codefactory.se) is kicking arse at the moment;
perhaps you could pitch in and help out?
> and interface with Outlo
Hi all,
So, I'm beginning the ISP learning curve. I have to get my head around
RADIUS, and I've been looking at FreeRADIUS given Russell's recommendation.
I'll be interfacing with a couple of PM3s.
Where's a good place to read up on this from a beginner's perspective? The
documentation is referen
Hi all,
So, I'm beginning the ISP learning curve. I have to get my head around
RADIUS, and I've been looking at FreeRADIUS given Russell's recommendation.
I'll be interfacing with a couple of PM3s.
Where's a good place to read up on this from a beginner's perspective? The
documentation is refere
> Does anyone try the User Mode Linux to do virtual hosting? Is the UML
> enought secure for this? In the web page said that virtual hosting is posible
> but he doesn't know of anyone who's doing this...
When I described doing this as "batshit insane" at linux.conf.au earlier
this year,
> Does anyone try the User Mode Linux to do virtual hosting? Is the UML
> enought secure for this? In the web page said that virtual hosting is posible
> but he doesn't know of anyone who's doing this...
When I described doing this as "batshit insane" at linux.conf.au earlier
this year,
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
Oh cool! I will test it for you! :)
Thanks heaps Russell,
- Jeff
--
"Anyway - I need somethin
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
Oh cool! I will test it for you! :)
Thanks heaps Russell,
- Jeff
--
"Anyway - I need somethi
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
> Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is too
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I r
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
> Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is to
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficul
> Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be done
> better by Portslave.
Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in
ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite software to administer, and
there are lots of times I'd like a simple, eas
> Is there a module or package that lets apache run
> asp files ?
It varies depending on whether you are talking about the ASP platform (which
there are proprietary packages for Apache migration purposes) or just using
VBScript, which there are faux-interpreters and some converters.
It's impor
> I hate admining email... no wonder I've never had to do this before.
found in headers:
X-Motto: Fuck you, I'm smart!
X-Saying: Could not connect to database
Might want to revise your motto. :)
- Jeff
--
make: *** No rule to make target `whoopee'. Stop.
--
To
> Ah -- OK. Thanks for clueing me in -- I hadn't realised.
deb http://solutionsfirst.com.au/debian stable sol1
> Is the difference worth it? (I.e. what can't-possibly-do-without
> goodies am I going to get that will persuade me to roll my own before
> >= v2.01 makes it into testing?)
I reck
> This is managable. You just have to keep one root shell open while trying
> a second login, if you can't login again in another session then you still
> have the first session open to fix things. Also have busybox-static (or
> something similar) installed to fix problems with shared librarie
> I think the next step will probably be my own distro, like LFS
> (http://www.inuxfromscratch.org/).
I guess we should end the thread with a laugh, then.
- Jeff
--
Australians don't dislike Americans, we just dislike the sight, sound
and thought of them.
> LMTP would be the best if talking about Cyrus).
> It should support LDAP database.
Postfix supports both of these. It is an *awesome* MTA.
- Jeff
--
I must be getting old... Buying toothpaste with gel in it is no longer
an Absolute Necessity.
> Hmmm, I can see it's in early stage of developement.
Yes. :)
> Does postfix support ldap nativly ?
Absolutely!
- Jeff
--
Is Murphy's Law constitutional?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
> However, AFAIK it can be done only with Cyrus with its IMAP Aggregator, or
> with qmail-ldap + Courier-IMAP...
You ought to check out Scalemail, which is being developed expressly for
this purpose. It is a combination of Courier POP/IMAP and postfix. Very
powerful combo.
- Jeff
--
"Fu
> i hope this is useful to someone...there was no information at all on
> the topic when i searched for it on google yesterday.
Craig, that's very cool. I don't have an immediate use as yet, but thank you
for publishing your hack to the list for everyone!
- Jeff
--
"And the beanbag is a
> I know oracle has "optimistic" locking and "versioning". I **think**
> postgres does too? Comments?
Postgres has better than row level locking (I'm sure Craig was just
simplifying earlier), plus reading and writing are independent. See:
http://postgresql.planetmirror.com/devel-corner/doc
> I've found varying reviews to be mixed. Just by searching for "postgres
> mysql comparison" like you said I found this:
> http://phd.pp.ru/Software/SQL/PostgreSQL-vs-MySQL.html
Any comparison should take note of PostgreSQL's incredible leaps in speed
with version 7.1, and even more features
> Slashdot uses mySQL as its database and I don't think that anyone
> could plausibly argue that /. isn't an intensive use of a database by a
> very busy, and very successful, Web site.
It's also a very botched job. The code that slashdot runs - the previous
generation of SlashCode - is at be
> Is the domain function in Samba the way to provide logon scripts to those
> clients?
Samba supports Windows NT domains in version 2.2, and this will allow you to
set up login scripts, etc.
Note that earlier versions only support "pseudo-domains" for Windows 9x
clients.
- Jeff
--
"From
> The gateways can't ping eachother
Please read the documentation -> the gateways will *not* be able to ping
each other. FreeS/WAN only routes the traffic to and from each subnet behind
the gateway.
- Jeff
--
Toothpaste is the most important meal of the day.
--
> What is the better solution for one cluster (beowulf, etc)? I don't want a
> warflame for this eh? ;) The clusters will run Apache and a dynamic site
> with php and mysql. By the documentation I'm reading, I think the best
> option is Mosix... Have a cluster /web more difficult for administra
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
