Re: Suggestions for remote server monitoring

2005-01-04 Thread Jacob S
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:50:24 +0300 Peter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What software would people recommend for remotely monitoring a > server? I'm > not talking about intrustion detection and whatnot, just keeping an > eye on things like CPU load, memory, bandwidth usage, etc. Bonus

Re: PHP 4.1.2

2004-12-23 Thread Jacob S
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:36:24 +0100 Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22. Dec 2004, at 23:58 Uhr, Jacob S wrote: > > You make it sound like the version in Sarge has these security > > vulnerabilities fixed. Except, it's still 4.3.9 - instead of 4.3.10 > &g

Re: PHP 4.1.2

2004-12-22 Thread Jacob S
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:13 +0100 Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22. Dec 2004, at 23:12 Uhr, Jason Lim wrote: > > Little bugfixes and even local exploits... okay... i can understand > > there > > is less urgency. But for REMOTELY exploitable vulnerabilities, i > > think there is a

Re: MySQL Max connections?

2004-12-07 Thread Jacob S
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:14:41 -0500 Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Jacob S said: > > Do you or anybody else know what the default number is for > > max_connections? I suppose it could be system load causing my > > problem, since t

Re: MySQL Max connections?

2004-12-07 Thread Jacob S
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:07:08 +0100 Achim Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 07.12.2004, 11:47 -0600 schrieb Jacob S: > > Can anyone tell me if this is the correct way to increase the max > > number of connections, or how to do it if it's not? I would

MySQL Max connections?

2004-12-07 Thread Jacob S
Hello list, I am having a problem with mysql refusing connections intermittently on a webserver. It acts like an invisible limit has been hit on the maximum number of connections. Not finding any info in the config files about the max number of connections allowed, I did some googling. This url

Re: reverse name resolution

2004-11-23 Thread Jacob S
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:02:40 -0200 Djalma Fadel Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm using debian with bind 9 and itsn't reverse resolving. > > bind version: ii bind9 9.2.4-1 > > The problem is that I cannot resolve IPs. > > # host 200.247.36.2 > Host 2.36.247.200.in

Re: Debian for ISP

2004-11-16 Thread Jacob S
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:24 -0700 Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > I have just took over a network for an ISP that is running Debian, I > am used to > using Cpanel/Whm and now I have to use the CLI. > > The ISP also provides Hosting services and it uses dbdns 1.03, > tinydns, x

Re: Live web Chat for support and sales

2004-09-08 Thread Jacob S.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:56:58 -0300 Yves Junqueira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I know a few comercial sollutions for live web chat systems. > > LivePerson and PHPLive! are the ones I tried and liked. > > But do you guys know any free alternative, if possible one that can > PUSH conversat

Re: Apache umask

2004-08-18 Thread Jacob S.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote: > Jacob S. wrote: > > >By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else > >through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640. > > > >I know php has a umask a

Apache umask

2004-08-18 Thread Jacob S.
By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640. I know php has a umask and a chmod function that could help with this, but this only fixes it for scripts that use php. Isn't there a way to change the defa

Re: Woody+Testing Apache Segmentation Fault

2004-08-05 Thread Jacob S.
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:41:50 +0200 Ian Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I have a problem with my webserver. It was originally setup with > Potato (or earlier version) of Debian a few years back. > > Currently it has been fully upgraded to Woody, plus selected > packages have been upg