Re: IMAP before relay

Le lun 21/06/2004 à 02:31, Conny Brunnkvist a écrit : > Nate Duehr wrote: > > > Ward Willats wrote: > > > >> Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > >> server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > > > > Anyone know of any good way to i

Re: IMAP before relay (was: pop before smtp relay)

Le dim 20/06/2004 à 08:26, Nate Duehr a écrit : > Ward Willats wrote: > > > Yeah, everyone _should_ use AUTH (and heck, SSL), but for a boutique > > server with few relayers, pop-before-smtp still works very well, thank > > you, with no existing client configuration changes. > > Anyone know of

Re: relay protection for Postfix

Le sam 19/06/2004 à 01:29, Aaron Goulding a écrit : > Okay, there's a lot of talk on -user about spam control, and I'd like to > make sure my own server is properly secured. Could anyone recomend basic > steps for Debian STABLE running Postfix for the MTA, to make sure it's not > being used as a