I would check /etc/login.defs, you can specify the Mail drop there. You
can further customize the default adduser options in /etc/adduser.conf
(i think it is...)
~duane
Splash Tekalal wrote:
I've found an interesting, if annoying bug in my system and was
wondering if anyone could suggest a fix.
things like disabling a domain
quickly, without having to worry about removing content, I'd be
interested to hear the reasoning
behind not using symlinks for DocumentRoot.
--
Duane Powers
uberLAN Technologies
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.getuber.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
hi list,
I'm using mod_vhost_alias for both name and ip based virtual hosting,
I'd like to enable b/w limits for the vhosts, I've looked at
mod_throttle, but it doesn't appear to play nice with mod_vhost_alias.
I'm thinking I can't throttle through the switch, since name-based
vhosts share ip's
Hi List,
I"ve been playing with postfix and ldap here lately, and I've run into a
difficulty, I'm using debian woody (with a 2.4.18 kernel)
I have postfix/postfix-ldap installed on one server, and I'm trying to
query the LDAP server as seen below:
Sep 20 14:13:05 ldap-server slapd[181]: daemon:
Hi List,
I"ve been playing with postfix and ldap here lately, and I've run into a
difficulty, I'm using debian woody (with a 2.4.18 kernel)
I have postfix/postfix-ldap installed on one server, and I'm trying to
query the LDAP server as seen below:
Sep 20 14:13:05 ldap-server slapd[181]: daemon
t;(tried it but didn't work).
>If anyone got an idea what the problem could be, I would be very happy.
>
>
This is very often caused if your ISP does not have reverse dns built
for your ip-space. Verify that you have reverse records, even if you
use dynamic ip's, and if no rec
Hey list,
I'm wondering what the debian faithful are using for customer records,
billing software and the like. I've found freeside, does anyone know
anything of it? Suggestions, experiences and urls welcome.
Thanks for the help,
~duane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
oo but I hate that
whole /var/qmail directory structure. It isn't GPL either... Exim also
has TONS of documentation. I briefly looked at PostFix and it seems like
a viable alternative as well but has less docs than exim.
Greg
Duane Powers
uberLAN.net
o get some input
on what the list is using. Here are my basic requirments:
security conscious
virtual email accounts, likely using LDAP
spam control
ease of configuration
I"m kinda leaning toward postfix, but that's just because I like the
cover of the book I saw at borders yesterday
Duane Powers
uberLAN.Net
for me quite well. Qmail does too but I hate that
> whole /var/qmail directory structure. It isn't GPL either... Exim also
> has TONS of documentation. I briefly looked at PostFix and it seems like
> a viable alternative as well but has less docs than exim.
>
> Greg
>
o get some input
on what the list is using. Here are my basic requirments:
security conscious
virtual email accounts, likely using LDAP
spam control
ease of configuration
I"m kinda leaning toward postfix, but that's just because I like the
cover of the book I saw at borders ye
Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
Hey Russell,
Friday, June 22, 2001, 11:07:37 AM, you wrote:
RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed up then
RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much...
I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get messed up,
it
Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Hey Russell,
>
>
> Friday, June 22, 2001, 11:07:37 AM, you wrote:
>
> RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed up then
> RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much...
>
> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot we
Fraser Campbell wrote:
":yegon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
we have several servers colocated with several ISP's
i am trying to sort out some configuration that would ensure good uptime for
customers
We're helping a customer with a similar situation. They have multiple
incoming Internet connectio
Fraser Campbell wrote:
> ":yegon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>we have several servers colocated with several ISP's
>>i am trying to sort out some configuration that would ensure good uptime for
>>customers
>>
>
> We're helping a customer with a similar situation. They have multiple
> in
? If I then insert a root disk,
it kernel panics, with can't load filesystem on 02:00. I'm using kernel
2.4.5 and a standard rescue image from www.debian.org. (1.44)
Thanks in Advance,
Duane Powers
? If I then insert a root disk,
it kernel panics, with can't load filesystem on 02:00. I'm using kernel
2.4.5 and a standard rescue image from www.debian.org. (1.44)
Thanks in Advance,
Duane Powers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list,
I am searching for a webmaster-level control panel, for customers
hosting sites on my server, I am looking for something that would allow
users to add/remove email accounts, play with their cgi/ssi, manage
autoresponders, et al. Any suggestions? What do you guys use?
Thanks,
Duane
Hi list,
I am searching for a webmaster-level control panel, for customers
hosting sites on my server, I am looking for something that would allow
users to add/remove email accounts, play with their cgi/ssi, manage
autoresponders, et al. Any suggestions? What do you guys use?
Thanks,
Duane
Haim Dimermanas wrote:
Hi all,
I own the domain dudle.net and I signed up with secondary.com to get
secondary (slave) name servers for this domain. On the master, I use
potato with bind 8.2.3-0.potato.1 (the current stable bind package).
My problem is the following : the master sends NOTIFY reque
Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I own the domain dudle.net and I signed up with secondary.com to get
> secondary (slave) name servers for this domain. On the master, I use
> potato with bind 8.2.3-0.potato.1 (the current stable bind package).
>
> My problem is the following : the master
Jason Lim wrote:
Well, here is the stupid and interesting thing.
I've got more than 5 boxes here, all using the SAME realtek cards. Now if
it was some negotiation error between card and switch, then it, in theory,
should occur with all of them. Also, I mentioned that I had SWITCH cards
around, so a
Jason Lim wrote:
> Well, here is the stupid and interesting thing.
>
> I've got more than 5 boxes here, all using the SAME realtek cards. Now if
> it was some negotiation error between card and switch, then it, in theory,
> should occur with all of them. Also, I mentioned that I had SWITCH cards
DI Peter Burgstaller wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> > > Most (of our) engineers are not linux-compliant.
> > > Need centralized login, (can't use NIS+, we've already got a NIS+ system
> > > for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
> >
> > You might like to look into using LDAP for this. Another alt
DI Peter Burgstaller wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> > > Most (of our) engineers are not linux-compliant.
> > > Need centralized login, (can't use NIS+, we've already got a NIS+ system
> > > for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
> >
> > You might like to look into using LDAP for this. Another al
Thanks, I'll look into systemimager... I've had no experience with it.
~duane
>
>
> On Wednesday 28 March 2001 07:58, Duane Powers wrote:
> > Ok all,
> >
> > I've talked upper management into rolling out linux as the primary
> > OS/workstation for t
Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:58:27PM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
> > 30+ similar machines with debian, life sucks, eh? :o)
> > discussion on the list before... I don't know if anyone has the details
> > on redhat's kickstart program,
> > and
Thanks, I'll look into systemimager... I've had no experience with it.
~duane
>
>
> On Wednesday 28 March 2001 07:58, Duane Powers wrote:
> > Ok all,
> >
> > I've talked upper management into rolling out linux as the primary
> > OS/workstation for t
Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:58:27PM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
> > 30+ similar machines with debian, life sucks, eh? :o)
> > discussion on the list before... I don't know if anyone has the details
> > on redhat's kickstart program,
> > and
a NIS+ system
for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
May need to be reinstalled occassionally due to high tech network
engineers hosing
various applications (these are going to be workstations, not servers...
accessed frequently by different users... stuff will get broken)
Any helpful
a NIS+ system
for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
May need to be reinstalled occassionally due to high tech network
engineers hosing
various applications (these are going to be workstations, not servers...
accessed frequently by different users... stuff will get broken)
Any helpful
Neale Banks wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
I need to make some serious changes to my kernels, on various servers at
my location, I have everything from
486's up to 1.2Gig boxes, so rather than compiling on the cpu and
RAM-challenged boxes, I'd like to make kernels
on
Neale Banks wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Duane Powers wrote:
>
>> I need to make some serious changes to my kernels, on various servers at
>> my location, I have everything from
>> 486's up to 1.2Gig boxes, so rather than compiling on the cpu and
>> RAM
ppy. : )
btw, all potato boxen, 2.2 and 2.4 kernels involved.
Thanks,
Duane Powers
ppy. : )
btw, all potato boxen, 2.2 and 2.4 kernels involved.
Thanks,
Duane Powers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthew H. Ray wrote:
Duane Powers wrote:
I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all withDebian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidthand centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-getsource. then I can apt-get update ; apt
Matthew H. Ray wrote:
Duane Powers wrote:
I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all withDebian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidthand centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-getsource. then I can apt-get update ; apt
I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
source. then I can apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
box, a
I have a question - I have a dozen boxen that I am maintaining, all with
Debian ( almost all potato - one woody) I would like to save bandwidth
and centralize administration by utilizing one of the boxes as a apt-get
source. then I can apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade ; done, on one
box,
um, I'm sorry, I wasn't following the whole thread,
but I am using eepro100 cards almost exclusively on debian and redhat boxen...
they work great, even with 2.4 (starting at 2.4pre8) for about 5 months now...
I previously was using the boomerang/vortex 3com nic's, but had reliability
problems with
um, I'm sorry, I wasn't following the whole thread,
but I am using eepro100 cards almost exclusively on debian and redhat boxen...
they work great, even with 2.4 (starting at 2.4pre8) for about 5 months now...
I previously was using the boomerang/vortex 3com nic's, but had reliability
problems with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:42:35AM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
Is he going to be using static ip's?
Yup. It's for his business.
I don't know of any ISP that will perform the routing nescessary for this for DSL custom
I've been looking for the same thing. I really wouldn't mind finding
someone who'd let me put a box at his place. 'cuz if my dns goes, so
goes my website, *critical* mail services and everything else. And I'd
be willing to do the same in return.
~duane
Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
> Is there
43 matches
Mail list logo
