Don't give them shell access, and don't let them ftp to the server.
Make them email you all the changes so you can browse for bad code.
Then you
can upload the changes. You will get tired of that real quick. Other
than this method there is always a what if factor selinux,chroot,
virtual serve
What about rbash? Not perfect by any means.
Doug Griswold
Unix/Linux Support
SC Office of the CIO
(803)896-0153
>>> Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/05/04 4:43 PM >>>
On Friday 05 November 2004 16:19, Stephen Le wrote:
> I don't think sudo is appropriat
Take a look at sudo.
>>> Stephen Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/5/2004 12:31:21 PM >>>
Hello all,
Is there an easy way to limit the commands a certain group of users
can execute? I've looked at chroot, and it's too complicated for my
needs and seems too easy to circumvent; users will be able to upload
echo $PATH as root and see if /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin are
in root's path. If they are maybe you issued "su" instead of "su -".
>>> "Johnno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/24/04 4:20 PM >>>
Hello
When I do a apt-get upgrade on one the the servers here I get this error
message:
Do you want t
c/modules... there in no entry
with anything near this? Strange
Doug Griswold wrote:
> Do a lsmod and look for the 3 com module that is loaded. Then look in
> /etc/modules.conf and modules to see if you have a options line near
> that module that might be setting the duplex. You can
t i havent coded anything... This is a standard debain
woody install on a Althon XP box...
Doug Griswold wrote:
> Are you sure that you havn't hard coded the duplex in a script or
> elsewhere? lspci should show you which nic you have in the server.
>
>
>>>>Simon B
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: off
Supports Wake-on: pumbg
Wake-on: d
Doug Griswold wrote:
> Try checking with ethtool. Which nic are you using?
>
>
>>>>Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/27/04 8:13 PM >>>
>
Try checking with ethtool. Which nic are you using?
>>> Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/27/04 8:13 PM >>>
Hi There, i have a debian woody box that i am connected to via ssh, here
is the ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:FC:XX:XX:XX
inet addr:203.109.xxx.xx
I curently have 2 hba's connected on a san and want to implement
failover. When you first install them you see twice as many disks since
there are 2 paths. My question is can you use the md/multipath module
to get failover?
If so can you do it without using software raid? The aray is already
usi
n)
Petrisor Eddy Marian
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Griswold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Servers with X.
>
> You can u
You can use the "-nolisten tcp" in /usr/X11R6/bin/startx in
defaultserverargs="-nolisten tcp" this should keep X from listening on
port 6000.
>>> Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/19/03 01:41AM >>>
Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:28, Rudi Starcevic wrote:
> > Is it bad practise
Do any of you know of a good open source resource monitor that would
monitor window, novell, *nix servers? I'm looking for something
simliar to IBM tivoli resource monitor or ca unicenter but open source.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Have any of you seen this error before( kernel: udp v4 hw csum failure)?
I can't seem to figure out what is causing this error but it occurs
about every hour or so. This is on kernel 2.4.20 with an e100 intel
driver compiled in on a debian woody system.
Thanks
gt;>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it
comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installi
from redhat and re-partitioned and then went on with the
install.
>>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 15:37 PM >>>
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:41, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but
not
> much. I now
gt;>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:26:46PM -0500, Doug Griswold wrote:
> You are right about the 10 percent hdparm is kinda suckey when it
comes
> to giving absolute resulte but it will give you a general idea of what
> the disks are doing. I didn't reassign the disks when installi
from redhat and re-partitioned and then went on with the
install.
>>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 15:37 PM >>>
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:41, Doug Griswold wrote:
> I installed the Red Hat kernel and performance was affected some but
not
> much. I now
in this to me a little more that would be good. I really
like Debian and would like to be able to use it on everything so I need
to learn how to optimize this box so it will run as good or better than
red hat.
Thanks
>>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 05:45 AM >&
in this to me a little more that would be good. I really
like Debian and would like to be able to use it on everything so I need
to learn how to optimize this box so it will run as good or better than
red hat.
Thanks
>>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/22/03 05:45 AM >&
Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda. Now using Debian I am
getting 40-50Mb/s. I am using the 2.4.19-ac4 kernel and aacraid module.
I'm sure it i
Hey guys I am having a small performance problem with a dell 1650 with
the perc3/di raid 5 card. I had red hat on this box and was getting
70-75Mb/s when testing with hdparm -tT /dev/sda. Now using Debian I am
getting 40-50Mb/s. I am using the 2.4.19-ac4 kernel and aacraid module.
I'm sure it i
21 matches
Mail list logo
