"Jeremy D. Zawodny" wrote:
>
> You might find the output of `vmstat' to be a bit more friendly.
Yes, friendly, but it doesn't break down information by processes. We
would like to know what is eating our memory/cpu and what processes
aren't getting what they need.
--David
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hello -
Is there good method or a good application for logging top (or similar)
information? We'd like to capture all such information for historical
performance monitoring, but top is not very capture-friendly.
Thanks for any help. Currently running slink.
--David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
> >Hubs go "poof" far less often than PCs running Linux.
I agree... if you really want guaranteed uptime, then just make
everything redundant. I.e., extra NICs, extra hubs/routers, and lots of
extra wires, and take the hardware out of the equation. That's still
going to be cheaper than buying a
> >Hubs go "poof" far less often than PCs running Linux.
I agree... if you really want guaranteed uptime, then just make
everything redundant. I.e., extra NICs, extra hubs/routers, and lots of
extra wires, and take the hardware out of the equation. That's still
going to be cheaper than buying
I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's all
assuming that there are debian packages out there that are up to date
(which they're generally not). But this seems to be the only major
drawback I've found to Debian.
--d
"Chad A. Adlawan" wrote:
>the reason why i chose MySQL is because its the first RDBMS i have ever
> tried :-) ... i will try PostgreSQL someday. were not considering oracle
> yet because a small group as ours cant afford it :-)
>
Postgres seems very strong on the backend, but it needs
6 matches
Mail list logo
