r($1,2) }
'
This is another example of how easy it is to parse the tinydns
configuration syntax. Can you show me a script for BIND that reliably
does the same thing? Parse named.conf to figure out the active zone
files; parse the zone files; don't forget to deal with $ORIGIN and
$INC
t's the programmer's job to
deal with that complexity. What's really sad is that they continue
blithely creating files in overly complicated formats.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
P.S.
his outburst comes from someone who baldly claimed that the tinydns
data syntax is ``not human readable.'' Wow.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
his outburst comes from someone who baldly claimed that the tinydns
data syntax is ``not human readable.'' Wow.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isn't ``any easier'' for
programs to parse than the BIND configuration. That's ludicrous.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
isn't ``any easier'' for
programs to parse than the BIND configuration. That's ludicrous.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nge much easier for _programs_ than BIND does. If
someone wants to write a tool providing another configuration UI, he'll
have a much easier time with djbdns than with BIND, because the file
formats are much simpler. Everyone benefits.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of M
nge much easier for _programs_ than BIND does. If
someone wants to write a tool providing another configuration UI, he'll
have a much easier time with djbdns than with BIND, because the file
formats are much simpler. Everyone benefits.
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of M
8 matches
Mail list logo