## Andreas John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Any better ideas to solve the problem?
Do not use testing or unstable on machines exposed to the public.
There is no security support for them:
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
If you must use newer packages than those shipped with woody,
roll you
## Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:04:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1954 +0100]:
> > rbldns (djbdns) is (a) non-free,
> nope.
> rbldnsd is NOT djbdns.
Confusion :)
There is rbldns, part of djbdns:
## [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It concerns to a limit of 255 octals while one octal is equal
> 3 bit
They are talking about "octets", which stands for "eight bits".
In ASCII representation, that's a character.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I want to have Postfix route mail to two relays based on the sender. If the
> sender is from domain1 then I want to use the relay that is authorised with
> SPF for domain1, if the sender is from domain2 then I want to use the relay
> that has SPF records
## Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy.
> > For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you)
> > for only 300 users or 10M (much less than hotmail) for 30 000
> > users. It is probably not enough for a Hotm
## Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > So, now we would like Russel to explain why he does not like SAN.
> He probably doesn't advocate using SAN instead of local disks if you do not
> have a good reason to use SAN. If that's it, I *do* agree with him. Don't
> use SANs just for
## Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We put our mailboxes (about 100GB per server with cyrus IMAP)
> > in a fibrechannel-connected SAN (there're some EMC cabinets in
> That's how it is usually done with Cyrus IMAP (since upstream makes it quite
> clear that you are either stupid
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> SAN and NAS are best avoided IMHO.
We put our mailboxes (about 100GB per server with cyrus IMAP)
in a fibrechannel-connected SAN (there're some EMC cabinets in
out server rooms), wich runs fairly well. You have to look
for changing LUNs (this might be reall
## Theodore Knab ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> :01:01.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
> Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
> Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 026d
> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 72, IRQ 22
> I/O ports
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers (ServerRAID, for example) and
> > the problems of software RAID, I strongly suggest getting a decent
> > controller and do whatever RAID level you need.
> Hardware RAID is more expensive.
Yes. It's not a cheap solu
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers (ServerRAID, for example) and
> > the problems of software RAID, I strongly suggest getting a decent
> > controller and do whatever RAID level you need.
> Hardware RAID is more expensive.
Yes. It's not a cheap solu
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > > it?
> > Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
> Only for hardware RAID.
Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > > it?
> > Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
> Only for hardware RAID.
Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers
## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
## Donovan Baarda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In the case of Reiser vs JFS vs XFS vs ext3, it depends on what you
> want. If you want stability and reliability, then maturity is what
> counts. XFS and JFS have long histories, but not with Linux. ext3 is the
> newest but is a relatively simple extension
## Donovan Baarda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> In the case of Reiser vs JFS vs XFS vs ext3, it depends on what you
> want. If you want stability and reliability, then maturity is what
> counts. XFS and JFS have long histories, but not with Linux. ext3 is the
> newest but is a relatively simple extension
## Jose Alberto Guzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> One recomendation is to always use the latest reiserfs-tools from
> upstream in case of need, as the developers are constantly improving them.
In case of emergency, I do not want to rely on the latest improvements
(always hoping that all necessary i
## Jose Alberto Guzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> One recomendation is to always use the latest reiserfs-tools from
> upstream in case of need, as the developers are constantly improving them.
In case of emergency, I do not want to rely on the latest improvements
(always hoping that all necessary i
## Thomas Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Im currently looking into purchasing a pair of x345's does anyone here
> run debian successfully on these bastards?
Yes, no trouble here.
> Im abit troubled about the
> integrated scsicontroller (supporting raid1) which apparently is a
> LSI1030 i cant seem
## Thomas Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Im currently looking into purchasing a pair of x345's does anyone here
> run debian successfully on these bastards?
Yes, no trouble here.
> Im abit troubled about the
> integrated scsicontroller (supporting raid1) which apparently is a
> LSI1030 i cant seem
## Sickboy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Nevertheless, I don't find this desync acceptable.
So don't use propposed-updates. Packages in proposed-updates are not
officially released. "proposed-updates is NOT meant to be added by users."
(Martin Schulze in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
## Jose Alberto Guzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> But when I try to authenticate with plain (base64 encoded:
> 'user\0user\0password'), posfix complains with :
> postfix/smtpd[2134]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
> postfix/smtpd[2134]: PAM _pam_init_handlers: could not open /etc/pam.conf
Are yo
23 matches
Mail list logo
