Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Theodore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.2100 +0200]: > Be careful with indexing and slapindex. Thanks for the heads-up! I will make sure that slapindex gets enough intelligence so that it will refuse to index a running database. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me;

Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread Theodore Knab
Be careful with indexing and slapindex. Slapindex is supposed to be run when the slapd daemon is down, or the db is in read-only mode. >From the 'slapindex' man page: LIMITATIONS Your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not in read-write mode) when you do this to ensure

Re: Reports on Postfix + Amavis + SpamAssassin

2004-10-27 Thread Tomas Nuñez
I know some RRDTool graphs: amavis-stats - Virus statistics RRDtool frontend for Amavis couriergraph - Mail statistics RRDtool frontend for Courier-{POP,IMAP} mailgraph - Mail statistics RRDtool frontend for Postfix They are installable for unstable. Hope these help :) El Miércoles, 27 de Octubr

Re: Reports on Postfix + Amavis + SpamAssassin

2004-10-27 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Federico, > I need an advice on reporting in web pages (MRTG-Like) the activities of > a mail system build on Postfix + Amamisd-new + Spamassassin. > > Any clue? How about isoqlog for postfix? Not sure if a graphical version of analysis for SA and amavis-new is available. -- Best regards,

Re: Reports on Postfix + Amavis + SpamAssassin

2004-10-27 Thread Achim Schmidt
Am Mi, 2004-10-27 um 14.56 schrieb Federico Lazcano: > Hello everyone: > > I need an advice on reporting in web pages (MRTG-Like) the activities of > a mail system build on Postfix + Amamisd-new + Spamassassin. > > Any clue? > > I'm using Debian Sarge. $ apt-cache show mailgraph Package: mai

Reports on Postfix + Amavis + SpamAssassin

2004-10-27 Thread Federico Lazcano
Hello everyone: I need an advice on reporting in web pages (MRTG-Like) the activities of a mail system build on Postfix + Amamisd-new + Spamassassin. Any clue? I'm using Debian Sarge. As you can read, I'm not a native speaker. ;-) Saludos, Federico Lazcano - Soporte Técnico [EMAIL PROTE

Your partner will love you for this.

2004-10-27 Thread Faith Jordan
Show your partner how much you care! Enlarge your penis 3 - 5 inches today! http://www.galdiobover.com/9/4/index.php?ai=7790&com=35&; 45cSL45Y5652u008XS1Then he had horns, fire was leaping up from around his feet, with his trident pointed at Michael. I had committed myself to doing it when I se

Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1519 +0200]: > index default eq [...] > index objectClass eq ^^ that's the default anyway. Thanks for your tips. It's starting to make sense. > and (depending on your version of openldap) don't forget to stop the > dire

Re: nscd: Was Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1007 +0200]: > > Is there any reason why nscd should not be installed on a system? > > It's often a pain to use if you make frequent changes? It's got > a weird caching policy that I can't seem

Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread charlie derr
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0955 +0200]: nscd stopped running? No, I think I verified that in all cases. Either that or your LDAP Indexes need tweaking. Does anyone have a good set I could use as a basis. I am completely new to LDAP... my a

Re: apt-get upgrade

2004-10-27 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:20:26AM +1300, Johnno wrote: > > dpkg package is install, any ideas? > One main suggestion: use an appropriate list, you are OT here. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Re: nscd: Was Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1007 +0200]: > Is there any reason why nscd should not be installed on a system? It's often a pain to use if you make frequent changes? It's got a weird caching policy that I can't seem to control the way I interpret it? -- Please do not

nscd: Was Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 17:55, Donovan Baarda wrote: [...] > nscd stopped running? Sorry to subvert a thread like this, but has anyone else decided that nscd is pretty much essential for all systems, regardless of nss, or local nameservers? It seems without it there is _no_ dns caching of any kind

Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0955 +0200]: > nscd stopped running? No, I think I verified that in all cases. > Either that or your LDAP Indexes need tweaking. Does anyone have a good set I could use as a basis. I am completely new to LDAP... -- Please do not send

Re: long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 17:43, martin f krafft wrote: [...] > Has anyone experienced the above before? What could be the reason? > How can I fix this? [...] nscd stopped running? Either that or your LDAP Indexes need tweaking. -- Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~a

long delays with LDAP nss/pam

2004-10-27 Thread martin f krafft
We run a big cluster, managed by FAI, using LDAP and NFS to provide users with homogenous environments across all nodes. All machines run sarge, and slapd is tunnelled via SSL for security purposes. Read-only access to the passwd/group directory is anonymous. All nodes are running nscd. While this

Returned mail

2004-10-27 Thread Symantec_AntiVirus_for_Gateways
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 No such local user: 20rwk Reporting-MTA: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Canno