--On Friday, July 02, 2004 14:18 +1000 Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Physically plugging or unplugging a P-ATA (IDE) disk is not supported.
Some people have managed to get it to work, but it required the type of
engineering effort that most people won't want to apply to their
product
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:40, "Marek Isalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker writes:
> > Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
> > machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
> > if you can leave the machine running with a dead di
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:40, "Marek Isalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker writes:
> > Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
> > machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
> > if you can leave the machine running with a dead di
Em Qui, 2004-07-01 às 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > >
> > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > >
> >
> > Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> > SSL tunneling, rather than
Em Qui, 2004-07-01 às 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > >
> > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > >
> >
> > Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> > SSL tunneling, rather than
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers (ServerRAID, for example) and
> > the problems of software RAID, I strongly suggest getting a decent
> > controller and do whatever RAID level you need.
> Hardware RAID is more expensive.
Yes. It's not a cheap solu
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers (ServerRAID, for example) and
> > the problems of software RAID, I strongly suggest getting a decent
> > controller and do whatever RAID level you need.
> Hardware RAID is more expensive.
Yes. It's not a cheap solu
On Do, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:40:52 +0100, Marek Isalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker writes:
> >Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
> >machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
> >if you can leave the machine running with
Russell Coker writes:
Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
if you can leave the machine running with a dead disk instead of having
to do an emergency hardware replacement job.
I've not tried L
On Do, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:40:52 +0100, Marek Isalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker writes:
> >Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
> >machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
> >if you can leave the machine running with
* Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 14:52]:
> If you have a decent amount of RAM then the OS partition(s) will usually have
> almost no access apart from writes to /var/log, and if you use the "-" option
> in the syslog configuration that shouldn't be a significant load either.
>
Russell Coker writes:
Having the OS on one disk means that a single disk failure will kill the
machine. While you may have good backups it's always more convenient
if you can leave the machine running with a dead disk instead of having
to do an emergency hardware replacement job.
I've not tried L
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:37, Jogi Hofmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gustavo Polillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-30 17:22]:
> > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > it? thanks.
>
> We just recently started tests with adaptecs zcr cards (2010S) and
> aic-7
* Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-01 14:52]:
> If you have a decent amount of RAM then the OS partition(s) will usually have
> almost no access apart from writes to /var/log, and if you use the "-" option
> in the syslog configuration that shouldn't be a significant load either.
>
Michelle Konzack writes:
sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
Could be somebody trying to exploit a recently discovered Apache header
vulnerability. For instance: http://www.guninski.com/httpd1.html
malformed request: "CONNECT
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
> thanks.
I use LVM over software RAID 1 (mirroring). I use Debian stable
and I decided that boot partition over LVM was not worth,
specially because of trouble in case of disaster recovery.
So my RAID is as follow:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:37, Jogi Hofmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gustavo Polillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-30 17:22]:
> > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > it? thanks.
>
> We just recently started tests with adaptecs zcr cards (2010S) and
> aic-7
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:54:53 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
>
> ( '/var/log/boa/error_log.1' )
> __
> /
> | [30/Jun/2004:02:32:17 +] buffer overrun - read.c
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:04:01 +0200, Adrian wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OTOH, it can be argued that anybody stupid enough to fall for a 419
> deserves what he gets. Still, it's actual people being actually killed
> because of spam.
..it can also be argued the Nigerian 419 rule is raci
Hi!
* Gustavo Polillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-30 17:22]:
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
> thanks.
We just recently started tests with adaptecs zcr cards (2010S) and
aic-7902 controlors. Our solution is to have one disk to hold the OS and
thre
Hello,
sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
( '/var/log/boa/error_log.1' ) __
/
| [30/Jun/2004:02:32:17 +] buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
| [30/Jun/2004:09:59:12 +] buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
Michelle Konzack writes:
sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
Could be somebody trying to exploit a recently discovered Apache header
vulnerability. For instance: http://www.guninski.com/httpd1.html
malformed request: "CONNECT
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:43, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that
> > > > make it?
> > >
> > > Works as expected. RAID appear
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
> thanks.
I use LVM over software RAID 1 (mirroring). I use Debian stable
and I decided that boot partition over LVM was not worth,
specially because of trouble in case of disaster recovery.
So my RAID is as follow:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:54:53 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
>
> ( '/var/log/boa/error_log.1' )
> __
> /
> | [30/Jun/2004:02:32:17 +] buffer overrun - read.c
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:04:01 +0200, Adrian wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OTOH, it can be argued that anybody stupid enough to fall for a 419
> deserves what he gets. Still, it's actual people being actually killed
> because of spam.
..it can also be argued the Nigerian 419 rule is raci
Hi!
* Gustavo Polillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-30 17:22]:
> Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make it?
> thanks.
We just recently started tests with adaptecs zcr cards (2010S) and
aic-7902 controlors. Our solution is to have one disk to hold the OS and
thre
I've made very good experience with a backported freeswan 2.04-7,
ipsec as module and the stock kernel of stable (2.4.18):
connections to: freeswan, cisco (only PSK and with a small patch), w2k, xp
All of them as roadwarriors and mixed, too. Very tough and reliable!
I'm using iptables with it, es
Hello,
sinc 2004-06-14 I have following entries in my BOA-Log:
( '/var/log/boa/error_log.1' ) __
/
| [30/Jun/2004:02:32:17 +] buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
| [30/Jun/2004:09:59:12 +] buffer overrun - read.c, read_header - closing
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > > it?
> > Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
> Only for hardware RAID.
Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:43, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that
> > > > make it?
> > >
> > > Works as expected. RAID appear
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> >
> > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> >
>
> Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
There is also the kernel support in 2.6. If y
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 23.15, David Thurman wrote:
> On 6/30/04 10:43 AM, "Robert Cates" wrote:
> > Well I do not remember ever seeing on the evening news or morning
> > news paper that somebody was hurt or worst killed from a Spam
> > attack!
> Maybe no one has been killed, but given the human
I've made very good experience with a backported freeswan 2.04-7,
ipsec as module and the stock kernel of stable (2.4.18):
connections to: freeswan, cisco (only PSK and with a small patch), w2k, xp
All of them as roadwarriors and mixed, too. Very tough and reliable!
I'm using iptables with it, es
## Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > ## Gustavo Polillo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Is it possible to make lvm with raid ?? Is there anyone here that make
> > > it?
> > Works as expected. RAID appears as a simple SCSI drive.
> Only for hardware RAID.
Yes. Given the price of RAID controllers
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> >
> > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> >
>
> Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
There is also the kernel support in 2.6. If y
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 23.15, David Thurman wrote:
> On 6/30/04 10:43 AM, "Robert Cates" wrote:
> > Well I do not remember ever seeing on the evening news or morning
> > news paper that somebody was hurt or worst killed from a Spam
> > attack!
> Maybe no one has been killed, but given the human
37 matches
Mail list logo
