Am 2004-04-09 23:20:47, schrieb Andreas John:
>Hello!
>
>Before all this begins to get silly:
>You are playing with amount of money which I would not concern as
>pennyware. As from you mails before, it's clearly to recognize that you
I had a talk with the "Ministry of Communicatin" in Rabat and
On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 01:54:59 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg KÃhler wrote:
>> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> > the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> > the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new
Hi!
Dave Watkins wrote:
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Dav
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To kind
On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> hi,
>
> I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new owners of
> Mylex, LSI.
Mylex sucks.
> so, what's a good scsi ra
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
exactly that, but i
hi,
I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new owners of
Mylex, LSI.
so, what's a good scsi raid card that is in any of the woody kernel
install flavours and supported in standard (debian) kernels?
tinus
Am 2004-04-09 23:20:47, schrieb Andreas John:
>Hello!
>
>Before all this begins to get silly:
>You are playing with amount of money which I would not concern as
>pennyware. As from you mails before, it's clearly to recognize that you
I had a talk with the "Ministry of Communicatin" in Rabat and
On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 01:54:59 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg KÃhler wrote:
>> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> > the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new own
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 00:51, Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> > the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new own
Hi!
Dave Watkins wrote:
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Da
Hello!
Before all this begins to get silly:
You are playing with amount of money which I would not concern as
pennyware. As from you mails before, it's clearly to recognize that you
haven an idea, but no concept nor the skills you need. You will need
probably consultants who help you to find a c
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Pulu 'Anau wrote:
To kind
On Sa, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:43:55 +0200, Tinus Nijmeijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
> the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new owners of
> Mylex, LSI.
Mylex sucks.
> so, what's a good scsi rai
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
exactly that, but i
hi,
I used to use Mylex acceleraid cards (DAC960) which are in bf24 and in
the standard 2.4.* kernels. Now they are phased out by the new owners of
Mylex, LSI.
so, what's a good scsi raid card that is in any of the woody kernel
install flavours and supported in standard (debian) kernels?
tinus
Hello!
Before all this begins to get silly:
You are playing with amount of money which I would not concern as
pennyware. As from you mails before, it's clearly to recognize that you
haven an idea, but no concept nor the skills you need. You will need
probably consultants who help you to find a
Hello Arnt,
Am 2004-04-09 18:23:03, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
>On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:03:06 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> They offer me only E3 with 34 MBit !!!
>> And 34 MBit for 450.000 DH/month (41.000 Euro/month)
>
>..dude. For that kinda money, I could hang you a fe
Am 2004-04-09 17:49:42, schrieb Ralph Paßgang:
>Am Freitag 09 April 2004 16:03 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
>> Hello,
>
>Hi :)
Hello,
>in theory this is correct, but you should think about good manageable
>switches, so that you can build vlans. Without vlans your security in your
>network is not
Am 2004-04-09 17:32:57, schrieb Richard Zuidhof:
>Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
>> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
>> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
>
>Aren't there other provide
Hello Arnt,
Am 2004-04-09 18:23:03, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
>On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:03:06 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> They offer me only E3 with 34 MBit !!!
>> And 34 MBit for 450.000 DH/month (41.000 Euro/month)
>
>..dude. For that kinda money, I could hang you a fe
Am 2004-04-09 17:49:42, schrieb Ralph Paßgang:
>Am Freitag 09 April 2004 16:03 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
>> Hello,
>
>Hi :)
Hello,
>in theory this is correct, but you should think about good manageable
>switches, so that you can build vlans. Without vlans your security in your
>network is not
Am 2004-04-09 17:32:57, schrieb Richard Zuidhof:
>Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
>> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
>> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
>
>Aren't there other provide
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:03:06 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
>
> They offer me on
Am Freitag 09 April 2004 16:03 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Hello,
Hi :)
> [...]
> Now my Question:
>
> Creating a Local GBit-Network in Marocco is generaly no Problem, it
> is not a big difference between it and my local network, exept I need
> a little bit more cable.
in theory this is correct,
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
Aren't there other providers? I remember many routes to Morocco using
Seabone. You
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 16:03:06 +0200, Michelle wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
>
> They offer me on
Hello,
because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
They offer me only E3 with 34 MBit !!!
And 34 MBit for 450.000 DH/month (41.000 Euro/month)
Only my Proxim Tsun
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 22:53:15 +1000, Russell wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:32, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
> > > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html
> > >
> > > See the secti
Am Freitag 09 April 2004 16:03 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Hello,
Hi :)
> [...]
> Now my Question:
>
> Creating a Local GBit-Network in Marocco is generaly no Problem, it
> is not a big difference between it and my local network, exept I need
> a little bit more cable.
in theory this is correct,
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
> exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
> provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
Aren't there other providers? I remember many routes to Morocco using
Seabone. You
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:32, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
> > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html
> >
> > See the section on "osf" in the above URL for a better solution.
> > Simply block Windows machines from ac
Hello,
because I am in paning of a CyberCenter Network in Marocco the idea is
exploding !!! Exactly, I need very much Backbone-Power which can not
provided from the "Maroc Telecom"
They offer me only E3 with 34 MBit !!!
And 34 MBit for 450.000 DH/month (41.000 Euro/month)
Only my Proxim Tsun
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 22:53:15 +1000, Russell wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:32, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
> > > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html
> > >
> > > See the secti
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:51, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ..another idea; DDOS'ing spam hosts _off_ the net, say by using
> > other spam hosts as DOS relays? Spam headers contain the
> > originating ip
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Lucas Albers um 20:09:
> I got it work, but I was trying to make boot floppies so I could load the
> drivers from the install cd, so I could install direct on it.
> Could not find directions on this anywhere, or how to compile it
> statically in the kernel.
As far as
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:32, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
> > http://www.netfilter.org/patch-o-matic/pom-base.html
> >
> > See the section on "osf" in the above URL for a better solution.
> > Simply block Windows machines from ac
Уважаемые господа!
Предлагаем Вам 19 апреля принять участие в
однодневном мастер-классе по теме : «Упрощенная система
налогообложения».
Программа обучения:
1. Упрощенная система налогообложения (УСН). Налоги и сборы, исчисляемые при
УСН; в каких случаях организации, перешедшие на УСН, являются н
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:27:03 +1000, Russell wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:51, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ..another idea; DDOS'ing spam hosts _off_ the net, say by using
> > other spam hosts as DOS relays? Spam headers contain the
> > originating ip
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Lucas Albers um 20:09:
> I got it work, but I was trying to make boot floppies so I could load the
> drivers from the install cd, so I could install direct on it.
> Could not find directions on this anywhere, or how to compile it
> statically in the kernel.
As far as
Уважаемые господа!
Предлагаем Вам 19 апреля принять участие в
однодневном мастер-классе по теме : «Упрощенная система
налогообложения».
Программа обучения:
1. Упрощенная система налогообложения (УСН). Налоги и сборы, исчисляемые при
УСН; в каких случаях организации, перешедшие на УСН, являются н
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:51, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..another idea; DDOS'ing spam hosts _off_ the net, say by using other
> spam hosts as DOS relays? Spam headers contain the originating ip,
> and 2 such _can_ be set up to DOS each other. _Etc_.
The problem is that such attacks a
45 matches
Mail list logo
