It's gone too far. We need to deal with the anti-virus spam problem. Many
companies have stated that nothing other than a black-list will make them
change their anti-virus setup.
http://www.attrition.org/security/rant/av-spammers.html
I think that we need to setup a DNSBL service to list mach
It's gone too far. We need to deal with the anti-virus spam problem. Many
companies have stated that nothing other than a black-list will make them
change their anti-virus setup.
http://www.attrition.org/security/rant/av-spammers.html
I think that we need to setup a DNSBL service to list mach
> >>I was the poster who initiated the previous thread on this subject. The
> >>problem disappeared here after we went down to 2 GB of memory (although
> >>we physically removed it from the server rather than passing the arg to
> >>the kernel... shouldn't make a difference though, I'd imagine). W
> >>I was the poster who initiated the previous thread on this subject. The
> >>problem disappeared here after we went down to 2 GB of memory (although
> >>we physically removed it from the server rather than passing the arg to
> >>the kernel... shouldn't make a difference though, I'd imagine). W
Thanks to all who sent comments on this. I did some more testing and
went straight to the source for input.
if you want to try the 4G patch then i'd suggest Andrew Morton's -mm
tree, which has it included:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2-rc2/2.6.2-rc2-mm2/
i've
Thanks to all who sent comments on this. I did some more testing and
went straight to the source for input.
if you want to try the 4G patch then i'd suggest Andrew Morton's -mm
tree, which has it included:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.2-rc2/2.6.2-rc2-mm2/
i'v
Hello.
Type in "Jesus Help Me" and see what happens.
Hello.
Type in "Jesus Help Me" and see what happens.
> I don't have a footnote, but I believe a recent linux journal article says
> that the 2.6 kernel uses a posix threads library which are much nicer than
> linux threads and that redhat has backported this support to RH9 and the
> 2.4 kernel.
>
> It should be possible to DL the redhat 2.4 patches
Fred Whipple wrote:
Hi Everyone,
A while back I asked for some feedback and got a very rich set of info
from folks about Debian used in a stable ISP environment as compared to
other OS's and distributions. All the info was very helpful and helped
us further solidify our desire (though not yet d
> I don't have a footnote, but I believe a recent linux journal article says
> that the 2.6 kernel uses a posix threads library which are much nicer than
> linux threads and that redhat has backported this support to RH9 and the
> 2.4 kernel.
>
> It should be possible to DL the redhat 2.4 patches
Fred Whipple wrote:
Hi Everyone,
A while back I asked for some feedback and got a very rich set of info
from folks about Debian used in a stable ISP environment as compared to
other OS's and distributions. All the info was very helpful and helped
us further solidify our desire (though not yet
Thank you for your interest in The Breakwaters.
To inquire about availability or to make a reservationplease contact
James Madru @ 508-775-6831.
I will be happy to answer any questions you might have about the
Breakwaters.
Best regards
James Madru
Thank you for your interest in The Breakwaters.
To inquire about availability or to make a reservationplease contact
James Madru @ 508-775-6831.
I will be happy to answer any questions you might have about the
Breakwaters.
Best regards
James Madru
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
-
(deutsche Version unten)
Dear SuSE Linux User,
thank you for your message regarding "hello".
Please note that the email address you sent your message to
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is no longer in use. Of course you still can sen
-
(deutsche Version unten)
Dear SuSE Linux User,
thank you for your message regarding "hello".
Please note that the email address you sent your message to
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is no longer in use. Of course you still can sen
Does anyone know of a way to get Movable Type to detect that
Image::Magick is installed?
I've installed the perlmagick package, but MT still refuses to believe
it's there, which is stopping me from making funky thumbnails for images
I upload.
When replying, please bare in mind that I know next t
17 matches
Mail list logo
