Hi!
Recently, my kernel started print messages like
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44669
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44750
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44668
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44749
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44748
TCP: drop ope
Hi!
Recently, my kernel started print messages like
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44669
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44750
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44668
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44749
TCP: drop open request from [ip-number]/44748
TCP: drop ope
Boy, are u gonna get answers
El mié, 14-01-2004 a las 08:56, Fred Whipple escribió:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things relating to the
> possibility of our company switching distributions from Red Hat to
> Debian. As most folks already know, Red Hat h
On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:40, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I have got a second connection.
> My server is in one class C subnet, say a.b.c.d with a default gateway
> a.b.c.1
> I have added a second connection eth1 g.f.e.246/30 (whose router, you
> can guess, is g.f.e.245) .
> Of course with this
Boy, are u gonna get answers
El mié, 14-01-2004 a las 08:56, Fred Whipple escribió:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things relating to the
> possibility of our company switching distributions from Red Hat to
> Debian. As most folks already know, Red Hat h
This one time, at band camp, Fred Whipple said:
> 1.) One of the biggest reasons we went with Red Hat many years ago was
> RPM. Of course I know that Debian has a package system, and there're
> constant arguments about which is better, if either. What I wonder,
> though, is how they compare f
Fred Whipple said on Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:56:35AM -0500:
> 1.) One of the biggest reasons we went with Red Hat many years ago was
> RPM. Of course I know that Debian has a package system, and there're
> constant arguments about which is better, if either. What I wonder,
> though, is how th
On Thursday 15 January 2004 12:40, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> I have got a second connection.
> My server is in one class C subnet, say a.b.c.d with a default gateway
> a.b.c.1
> I have added a second connection eth1 g.f.e.246/30 (whose router, you
> can guess, is g.f.e.245) .
> Of course with this
I have got a second connection.
My server is in one class C subnet, say a.b.c.d with a default gateway
a.b.c.1
I have added a second connection eth1 g.f.e.246/30 (whose router, you
can guess, is g.f.e.245) .
Of course with this setup i can only access the router via the second NIC.
If i add a sec
A few things that I haven't seen mentioned yet:
If you decide to run stable, but want just some latest and gratest software
you can normally download the latest Debianized source and compile you own
pacakges against stable.
There are also plenty of places on the net to get backported packages, b
This one time, at band camp, Fred Whipple said:
> 1.) One of the biggest reasons we went with Red Hat many years ago was
> RPM. Of course I know that Debian has a package system, and there're
> constant arguments about which is better, if either. What I wonder,
> though, is how they compare f
Fred Whipple said on Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:56:35AM -0500:
> 1.) One of the biggest reasons we went with Red Hat many years ago was
> RPM. Of course I know that Debian has a package system, and there're
> constant arguments about which is better, if either. What I wonder,
> though, is how th
Hello!
We use it with a lot of success. It servers for web interface to mail
for around 2000 customers - we are quite happy with.
W liście z pon, 12-01-2004, godz. 20:56, Kevin Lynch pisze:
> Kevin
>
I have got a second connection.
My server is in one class C subnet, say a.b.c.d with a default gateway
a.b.c.1
I have added a second connection eth1 g.f.e.246/30 (whose router, you
can guess, is g.f.e.245) .
Of course with this setup i can only access the router via the second NIC.
If i add a sec
A few things that I haven't seen mentioned yet:
If you decide to run stable, but want just some latest and gratest software
you can normally download the latest Debianized source and compile you own
pacakges against stable.
There are also plenty of places on the net to get backported packages, b
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:35 EST, Fred Whipple writes:
I'll answer just the points I have opinions/knowledge on.
>2.) A related reason we used Red Hat was that practically anything you
>could want to use was pre-packaged in a simple to install RPM. And they
>were typically pretty high qualit
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Whipple [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 January 2004 14:57
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Considering Debian (currently using Red Hat)
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things...
1)
Package: cruf
Hello!
We use it with a lot of success. It servers for web interface to mail
for around 2000 customers - we are quite happy with.
W liście z pon, 12-01-2004, godz. 20:56, Kevin Lynch pisze:
> Kevin
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:35 EST, Fred Whipple writes:
I'll answer just the points I have opinions/knowledge on.
>2.) A related reason we used Red Hat was that practically anything you
>could want to use was pre-packaged in a simple to install RPM. And they
>were typically pretty high qualit
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things relating to the
possibility of our company switching distributions from Red Hat to
Debian. As most folks already know, Red Hat has drastically changed
their strategy, and we ultimately must make *some* relatively drastic
change
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Whipple [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 January 2004 14:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Considering Debian (currently using Red Hat)
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things...
1)
Package: cruft
Priority
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to get some of your thoughts on a few things relating to the
possibility of our company switching distributions from Red Hat to
Debian. As most folks already know, Red Hat has drastically changed
their strategy, and we ultimately must make *some* relatively drastic
chang
- Original Message -
From: "Ujjwal Rana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: need your help
> i gave a following command ...as a result i was supposed to find a
> checkpasswor file inside bin
> \bin\checkpassword ...But i did not find any thing l
- Original Message -
From: "Ujjwal Rana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: need your help
> i gave a following command ...as a result i was supposed to find a
> checkpasswor file inside bin
> \bin\checkpassword ...But i did n
i gave a following command ...as a result i was supposed to find a
checkpasswor file inside bin
\bin\checkpassword ...But i did not find any thing like that . So could you
tell what may be my mistake for not finding the checkpassword file inside
bin . kindly have a look on below mention things t
i gave a following command ...as a result i was supposed to find a
checkpasswor file inside bin
\bin\checkpassword ...But i did not find any thing like that . So could you
tell what may be my mistake for not finding the checkpassword file inside
bin . kindly have a look on below mention things t
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:53:35AM +0100, Arnoud Warmerdam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have mounted my /tmp directory (which has it's own partition) with the
> noexec option. The reason i did this, was that a poorly written cgi-script
> caused a binary to be downloaded and executed in /tmp. Luckily, the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:53:35AM +0100, Arnoud Warmerdam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have mounted my /tmp directory (which has it's own partition) with the
> noexec option. The reason i did this, was that a poorly written cgi-script
> caused a binary to be downloaded and executed in /tmp. Luckily, the
28 matches
Mail list logo
