Adam Dawes wrote:
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks
Adam Dawes wrote:
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thank
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkin
Hello everybody,
Anyone found a solution to this problem ? I have exactly the same (with
http requests, si relative to port 80), and cannot solve it.
Thanks for advance.
--
Laurent
Repost :
ipvsadm and local addresses
*
Yes, that was part of the plan, to point my mx records to my provider.
Therefore, any connections to my port 25 should be from only folks that
are port scanning (sounds like a spammer to me). Think this is best done
as a firewall issue or via David's host_reject option?
thanks,
Adam
Dave Watkin
Hello everybody,
Anyone found a solution to this problem ? I have exactly the same (with
http requests, si relative to port 80), and cannot solve it.
Thanks for advance.
--
Laurent
Repost :
ipvsadm and local addresses
> > I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The
machine
> > does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> > whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
> >
> > Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other
magic
> > going on?
> I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The machine
> does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
>
> Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other magic
> going on? Possibl
> > I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The
machine
> > does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> > whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
> >
> > Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other
magic
> > going on?
> I do not appear to be having the same problem you guys are. The machine
> does not have a high load, but has not exhibited any problems
> whatsoever. Running vanilla source 2.4.23 from kernel.org.
>
> Are you using Debian kernel packages or vanilla source? Any other magic
> going on? Possibl
>
> What do I need to stick in my exim.conf to accept mail from just those
> hosts that will be processing my mail?
>
host_reject should do the trick, assuming you are running woody with 3.3x
11 matches
Mail list logo