And a few more details - My working setup
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux v1.02.00.036.
3w-: PCI Parity Error: clearing.
scsi0 : Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 0xe400, IRQ: 16, P-chip: 1.3
scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller
blk: queue f7e
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 00:54, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> >
> > so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
> > strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
> > not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) a
On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) and not do raid?), maybe
that
is important.
I decided on the 3ware
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> > kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> > be seeing it, though stranger thing
There are also a number of firmware updates availableKnown issues also
exist with Western Digital HDDs
--On Saturday, December 13, 2003 00:28 +0100 Tinus Nijmeijers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wr
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> > kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> > be seeing it, though stranger thing
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 00:18, Jason Lim wrote:
> I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
> sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
> buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
> performing the installation, i doubt y
I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
performing the installation, i doubt you can load up 3dmd during that time
(can you?).
And a few more details - My working setup
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux v1.02.00.036.
3w-: PCI Parity Error: clearing.
scsi0 : Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 0xe400, IRQ: 16, P-chip: 1.3
scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller
blk: queue f7
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 00:54, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> >
> > so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
> > strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
> > not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) a
On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) and not do raid?), maybe
that
is important.
I decided on the 3ware
I have an 8 port 8506-8 (no raid) and 3 250GB Disks running fine on a
debian bf24 box.
Have formated each disk with ext3 and 1 partition.
Have a RAID 5 setup running on SUSE 9 with 600GB Space, and also no
problems.
Andrew
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB
SATA
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> > kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> > be seeing it, though stranger thing
There are also a number of firmware updates availableKnown issues also
exist with Western Digital HDDs
--On Saturday, December 13, 2003 00:28 +0100 Tinus Nijmeijers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wr
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:35, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> > Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> > kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> > be seeing it, though stranger thing
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 00:18, Jason Lim wrote:
> I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
> sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
> buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
> performing the installation, i doubt y
I would suggest you have a look at the 3dm log file in /var/log as this
sounds like an issue in the communication between the linux disk io
buffering subsystem and the 3ware card. However, since you're just
performing the installation, i doubt you can load up 3dmd during that time
(can you?).
I have an 8 port 8506-8 (no raid) and 3 250GB Disks running fine on a
debian bf24 box.
Have formated each disk with ext3 and 1 partition.
Have a RAID 5 setup running on SUSE 9 with 600GB Space, and also no
problems.
Andrew
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB
SAT
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> be seeing it, though stranger things have happened.
>
> --On Friday, December 12, 2003 22:21 +0
Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
be seeing it, though stranger things have happened.
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 22:21 +0100 Tinus Nijmeijers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm guessin
I'm guessing someone here would know about this, so here goes:
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB SATA,
3ware 8506-4, raid 5) and the system freezes completely while formatting
a big partition ("unable to handle kernel paging request..." means
absolutely nothing to
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 22:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
> kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
> be seeing it, though stranger things have happened.
>
> --On Friday, December 12, 2003 22:21 +0
Kernel version specifically, and filesystem? Old 2.4 and 2.2 series
kernels experience this issue..But I find it hard to believe RH9 would
be seeing it, though stranger things have happened.
--On Friday, December 12, 2003 22:21 +0100 Tinus Nijmeijers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm guessin
I'm guessing someone here would know about this, so here goes:
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB SATA,
3ware 8506-4, raid 5) and the system freezes completely while formatting
a big partition ("unable to handle kernel paging request..." means
absolutely nothing to
Jason McMullen wrote:
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks and whatnot. The pr
Jason McMullen wrote:
Good Day All,
I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
"front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
unloaded due to dictionary attacks and whatnot. The
Jason,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Jason McMullen wrote:
>
> I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
> "front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
> mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
> unloaded
Jason,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Jason McMullen wrote:
>
> I'm running into an odd issue. We have 2 servers that act as
> "front-end" MX hosts running Sendmail. These servers then smarthost all
> mail back to a main server. This works well at keeping the main server
> unloaded
28 matches
Mail list logo
