On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:47, Jason Lim wrote:
> Mmm... one of the limitations of Qmail is that it creates many many
> individual files (one for each email) and due to filesystem limitations,
> EXT2/3 starts slowing to a crawl. Of course, another way would be to use
> ReiserFS, but wouldn't doing a FS
> Please people,
>
> What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and
> people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted
> for a discussion between kids. We are adults, we are professionals, this
> list is to discuss technicall matters (personal opinions a
I wrote:
>> Unfortunately, [Qmail's] not being maintained by its
>> author.
I've also used [PM]MDF and Smail. Their authors bailed, too.
I've used Slackware's and SuSE's Sendmail on personal systems,
but never for anything other people were depending on.
W.D. McKinney top-posted:
>I know of sev
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:19, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
> > I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
> > in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
> > (Anybody tried running the queue in a ramdisk?
>
> Running the queue on a ramdisk would kill reliability.
Indeed, been there
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron L. Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, 07 September, 2003 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..
> I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
> in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
> (Anybod
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:08, Eric Sproul wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 01:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I was under the impression that Sendmail also queues everything to disk.
> > How does it's queue operate then?
>
> While the message is coming in, Sendmail buffers the message to memory,
> optional
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 02:19, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
> I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
> in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
> (Anybody tried running the queue in a ramdisk?
Running the queue on a ramdisk would kill reliability.
Using a non-volatile RAM device
Hmm.
Since '98 ...good for you.
All the patches in the world don't help some folks anyway.Qmail has many
ways to skin a cat.
In the end, it's pick a horse and ride it. Exim, Postfix, Sendmail and
qmail all have querks. Like the Mutt homepage, "All mail clients suck.
This one just sucks less.
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:19:54PM -, Cameron L. Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I've given up on Qmail. I'm using Exim for small systems,
> and I'll try Postfix for my next big one.
Why won't you give exim a try on bigger systems?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
I've been running Qmail since '98. It's got a bottleneck
in disk writes, but aside from that it's fast.
(Anybody tried running the queue in a ramdisk?
Howabout in an fs made in a file mounted looback?)
It's secure and reliable.
Unfortunately, it's not being maintained by its
author. If you want
Please people,
What is the connection between the nationality of Wietse Venema and
people who sent spam? This is a very strange argument and more fitted
for a discussion between kids. We are adults, we are professionals, this
list is to discuss technicall matters (personal opinions allowed).
P
Jason Lim, Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:06:43AM +0800:
> Just wondering... I've got a 2.4Ghz Hyperthreading (100% it is the
> hyperthreading model), and the BIOS sees it.
>
> I then compiled the kernel... the usual, except added the SMP support
> setting "Symmetric multi-processing support". Nothing e
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 07:36 pm, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:24:35PM +0200, Sz?ts Róbert wrote:
> > Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall
> > where is more ppp connectoins? Expl.
> >
> > There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 09:31, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi Guus,
>
> Yes, BIOS setting is enabled. The ONLY thing that I haven't done is edit
> lilo to include the acpismp=force setting. Did you set that to make it
> work? Does it work without it (ie. SMP enabled WITHOUT modifying lilo)?
Haven't mod
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:01:29PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Friday 05 September 2003 13:45, Nico Meijer wrote:
>
> > - wietse venema is [...] d) dutch
>
> Taking into account that .nl is one of the major sources of spam right now
> (through a2000.nl a
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:24:35PM +0200, Sz?ts Róbert wrote:
> Does anyone know how can I put iptables firewall script onto a firewall where is
> more ppp connectoins?
> Expl.
>
> There is a firewall with two dsl connection the first is ppp0 the 2nd is the ppp1.
> It's clear.
>
> How can I bu
Hi Guus,
Yes, BIOS setting is enabled. The ONLY thing that I haven't done is edit
lilo to include the acpismp=force setting. Did you set that to make it
work? Does it work without it (ie. SMP enabled WITHOUT modifying lilo)?
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Guus Houtzager" <[EMAIL P
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:06, Jason Lim wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Just wondering... I've got a 2.4Ghz Hyperthreading (100% it is
>> the hyperthreading model), and the BIOS sees it.
>> Hope you can advise... as hyperthreading is there but not
>> being used, which is a waste and could add performa
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:06, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering... I've got a 2.4Ghz Hyperthreading (100% it is the
> hyperthreading model), and the BIOS sees it.
I have a 3.06 GHz P4 on an I845G chipset and in the BIOS I had to switch
the HT option from disabled to enabled. So is
19 matches
Mail list logo
